[Golden Eagle]

3. Mattis went to Gitmo—video’d—to warn them to prepare for a lot of VIP prisoners

So this appears to be the Q post in question, dated December 27.

https://i0.wp.com/exopolitics.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/QAnon.png

Then here is the article stating that Mattis went to Gitmo, but it is dated December 21st.

https://nypost.com/2017/12/21/mattis-makes-unusual-visit-to-gitmo/

Again, Q’s post regarding Gitmo came a full week AFTER Mattis had already gone to Gitmo.

So again there doesn’t appear to be any proof that Q predicted anything in advance, or that what he did provide in that post was of any value, since it all seems to be broad speculation with still no facts anywhere to support.

So O for 3 on your top 3, unless you think I’ve posted something incorrect, and can back that up.

Ready for more?

[Duchess47]

You are linking an anon linking to a twitter page of Qanon who is not Q.

[1_Rain_Drop]

"So again there doesn’t appear to be any proof that Q predicted anything in advance, or that what he did provide in that post was of any value, since it all seems to be broad speculation with still no facts anywhere to support."

Is Q supposed to predict in every single post?

If something is posted, maybe it is to be tied to, or it emphasizes something, or is just a reminder of a fact.

[JockoManning]

My perspective is different. I won't haggle about the details.

I will note that you seem to have no respect for the unnamed intelligence military folks many Q-anon interpreters have access to.

IIRC, the military tribunals thing was in the discussion before Mattis went to Gitmo. Given the givens in the Executive Order, Gitmo was and is the most logical source from the EO forward.

Mattis visit was after that fact.