This article is a Leftie evaluation of Qanon.
Only slightly interesting in and of itself.
But where is Qanon?
The first rule of QAnon is one does not talk about QAnon.
Which board on 4Chan?
Was it the Democrat Party behind the freaky doings at Comet Pizza? Or just certain Democrat big-wigs?
Disinformation?
Naive statements like that really make me laugh. So it just isn't possible that government can grow so large that its main goal is to preserve itself and grow at all costs, not to serve the public that created it and keeps it in office? It's not possible that the monstrous and unconstitutional administrative state, the "fourth branch," perpetuates itself at all costs? It's not possible for all the leftist radical hangers-on from a previous administration to fight tooth and nail the new administration working to root them out?
The author is a naif, a complete idiot and big government believer. But he is Brit or Indian, so it isn't surprising.
Lol... Praise Kek and bring on the covfefe. :-)
“”You guys know what this represents? Maybe it’s the calm before the storm,” President Donald Trump told reporters ominously as he posed with military commanders and their spouses in October 2017.”
If you watch the video of when Trump says this, he clearly draws the letter Q with his finger.
bookmark
THis is the push to get out in front of what’s going to happen...they’re painting this all as whacko conspiracy.
I can tell everyone that from my investigations of Harry Reid, where I track over twenty bribes, some in cahoots with John Podesta, the Deep State is VERY real. Hasn’t anyone wondered why Reid was never indicted?
Why has our foreign policy’s head been spinning around and spewing pea soup?
Simple answer: Silicon Valley in California got a lot of $$$
Bookmark
Trump greatly hinted he has Hillary’s 30,000 emails. if he does, it’s curtains for HER.
Bookmark
Just posted on a different Q thread, since no one seems to have an answer for either of these questions:
I guess I might be a party pooper, but can anyone name one (1) thing that Q has predicted in advance, with enough specificity to have actually prepared anyone for an actual event?
I realize it’s fun to look back after events actually happened, to try to determine if Q might have left you a clue to something that did happen, but if he wasn’t able to ever actually tip you off of anything specific in advance, is the post-analysis of his tweets really of any value?
Seriously, just asking. Thank you!
How do we know this Q isn’t just the new Ulstermann?
“Q: the highest level”
I thought Q was just a DOE nuke clearance, as in, you work w/reactors, etc..
Highest would be eyes only.