To: Tea Party Terrorist
Husbands and wives cannot be forced to testify against each other—but of course that is just a coincidence!
5 posted on
01/10/2018 10:09:52 AM PST by
cgbg
(Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
To: cgbg
I’m not a lawyer, but I suspect any such legal protection would probably hold even if they were divorced.
11 posted on
01/10/2018 10:10:59 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: cgbg
Husbands and wives cannot be forced to testify against each other—but of course that is just a coincidence!Exactly my initial thought.
28 posted on
01/10/2018 10:14:21 AM PST by
numberonepal
(First they came for Sarah, then they came for Herman, and now they've come for Trump.)
To: cgbg
56 posted on
01/10/2018 10:28:17 AM PST by
MNDude
(God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
To: cgbg
My first thought exactly!
Spousal privilege has new meaning with the revelation that Huma had Secret e-mail backed up on his computer. Unless the Obama Justice department immunized her (and I’m not putting it past them) - she is facing some difficulty, and the ability to make him unable to testify about their spousal communications could make her prosecution harder.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson