Those statements might be true, but they do not however support your conclusions. We spent 21 trillion on the War on Poverty since then, and it has a lot more to do with the increase in drugs and crime than does the "war on drugs."
In the short 10 years between 2003 and 2013, over 100 police officers were killed in WOD related actions. Again, PUBLIC RECORD.
And again, not proof of your conclusions.
If youd like to take exception to anything else Ive posted, come equipped with facts and data or move on to some other poster whos willing to entertain your nonsensical sputtering.
"Facts" which do not actually prove your case are a form of fallacy argument. Yes, your facts might be true, but that doesn't make your assertion true.
""Facts" which do not actually prove your case are a form of fallacy argument. Yes, your facts might be true, but that doesn't make your assertion true."
"In the short 10 years between 2003 and 2013, over 100 police officers were killed in WOD related actions. Again, PUBLIC RECORD. And again, not proof of your conclusions.
"Just exactly the way it happened with repeal of prohibition, right? The great depression happened during the prohibition era. Billions of dollars and untold lives have been wasted in the war on pot, to little effect beyond expanding government police powers. These are facts. Make of them what you will.
What conclusions do my FACTS not support (You arrogant twit)? What assertions have I made, that I did not subsequently support?
This is the post (of yours) that I responded to with supporting evidence
"The only fact you mentioned was that Prohibition occurred during the depression, and that one wasn't entirely accurate either because it ignored the fact that it also occurred during the "roaring twenties" which was an era of amazing economic growth. The rest of the stuff you mention isn't "facts", it's just your opinion.
Support your arguments.
Love ya,
-Hugh