Posted on 01/01/2018 1:24:38 PM PST by davikkm
Re: Brock gave $200,000
Atonement.
In 1993, David Brock, a former Conservative, wrote “The Real Anita Hill,” which attacked the credibility of a woman who accused future Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment.
$200,000 was an indulgence paid to the Church of Progressive Activism.
Would anyone reading this please click on Andrew Kerrs website? He is basically fighting David Brock by himself and could use our support. (Not money, but clicks and sharing the info on social media.)
https://www.thecitizensaudit.com/category/david-brock/
He is doing what Jeff Sessions should have done on day one.
On October 10, 2017, The Citizens Audit filed a Federal Election Commission complaint against David Brocks American Bridge 21st Century, American Bridge 21st Century Super PAC and Correct The Record.
From wikipedia...
Tompkins Buell is often described as Hillary Clinton's best friend.[4] She led Clinton's fundraising efforts for 2008 in the San Francisco Bay area.
In 2006, The Washington Post published a story about the Democracy Alliance, calling it an "exclusive donor club" for progressive donors and identifying Tompkins Buell and her husband Mark Buell as members.
(...Soros is another leading member)
Tompkins Buell held a fundraiser for David Brock's Media Matters at her San Francisco home. A foundation that bears her name gave money to Media Matters through the Tides Foundation.
(...more Soros organizations)
Reference[4] Gerth, Jeff; Van Natta, Don (2007). Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton. Littel & Brown. ISBN 9780316007849.
You make a good point.
How is this obvious fraud and tax evasion being ignored?
bump
Susie Tompkins Buell = Susan Tompkins
She and Hillary go back along way
Brock is the paid and admitted lair who runs Media Matters, one of teh most dishonest sites on the net.
Attkisson has some interesting comments re David Brook in her book “The Smear.”
I would say the offense is at least “solicitation to conspiracy to interfere with a federal election?”
I thought the important consideration was whether it was directed at a particular candidate. Maybe its not a problem for Hillary but surely its a violation of the law for the donors.
Nipping Brock has to be a priority.
He handles too much left-wing money.
There has to be dirt stuck to his hide.
Thanks for the reply!
Virtue signaling convinces the left of its own unimpeachable morals. When push comes to shove, it rejects guilt for any of its wrongdoing and attributes such allegations to conspiracy theories. -- How Democrats Suppressed the #MeToo Movement in the Party | FrontPage | April 27, 2018 | Daniel Greenfield
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.