So you are DoughtyOne media company and you’re getting largely negative information about the newly elected Chelsea Clinton administration from people inside her White House. You’ve verified it through more than one source, although they all are in or connected to Chelsea’s WH. All have asked that they not be identified or be cited as a source of the information. The information is plausible. There’s a chance competing media may also have been given the information and it’s a dog eat dog media world. It’s not the first time Chelsea or a key person in her administration has done something stupid, potentially illegal or just news worthy in general. Do you go with the information or do you sit on it.
Let’s look at a real world situation.
Obama had terrorists into the White House to consult with him.
He never provided a legitimate birth certificate.
He never provided other information to reveal how he obtained loans or admission to colleges.
Lets face it, they folks aren’t looking to reveal anything about Leftists they support in the Oval Office.
A simpler explanation is that they are just pulling it out of their arses, which is more likely given the massive number of retractions so far this year, troll boy.