Maybe someone needs to send this to the CDC and Trump.
Posted on 12/15/2017 5:42:16 PM PST by Trump20162020
The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including “fetus” and “transgender” — in any official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.
Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Maybe someone needs to send this to the CDC and Trump.
Nope. This is a win. Fetus has become a work around so they don’t have to use the word “baby”.
There goes half the mission statement. Heh
Exactly.
Big Win.
They can’t dehumanize the baby anymore.
Yes its more palatable
The Washington Post has more asian communists than the chinese politburo.
I agree. Fetus in American medical terms basically means expendable biological tissue.
But what’s up w/ “transgender,” “evidence-based” and “science-based”?
Exactly, they say they sell “fetal tissue”, not “baby parts”.
The first five make sense, but banning “evidence-based” or “science-based”? I have to suspect some inaccurate reporting going on here.
Soon there will be Nazi Gestapo troops being dispatched by the Democrats to arrest anyone who doesn’t comply
A one sided story from anonymous sources by Jeff’s blog.
Yeah, but... The left always demands control of the vocabulary...
Fake news?
This nation doesn’t speak Latin and they have redefined that word to me “not a baby” . It’s a wonderful thing to ban them from using it in documents so they can’t dehumanize a baby.
“evidence-based” and “science-based.”
Those terms have been hijacked by the left, like so many other things.
In this context they mean “fraudulent-evidence-based” and “political-science-based.”
Anyone who can’t understand and agree to the concept that it is a scientific fact that an unborn baby is a living human person, has no right to claim any position of theirs to be “evidence-based” and “science-based.”
Anyone who can’t understand and agree to the concept that biological male and female sexes are a scientific fact, has no right to claim any position of theirs to be “evidence-based” and “science-based.”
Anyone who can’t understand and agree anal intercourse is harmful and unhealthy, has no right to claim any position of theirs to be “evidence-based” and “science-based.”
Anyone who believes Alfred Kinsey was a scientist rather than a sexual predator and pervert of the worst kind, has no right to claim any position of theirs to be “evidence-based” and “science-based.”
CDC does some weird stuff with the language.
Way back in the late 1990s, for reasons I never got to the bottom of with the connections I had at NIH and USAMRIID or IDSNA, the term “homosexual” regarding males, was changed suddenly in the literature to “men who have sex with men.”
Who thinks like that?
Keep in mind CDC collates reems of data on infectious disease, publishing a weekly journal, the MMWR: “Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report”. We were being fed a pack of lies about “HIV is everyone’s disease” when in fact “The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS” blew this wide open before the gaystapo got the book remaindered.
Even more, the link between the upsurge in CA-MRSA strains (particularly USA-400) traceable to bath houses, zoo sex, the inordinate amount of antibiotics homosexual males took compared to normosexuals for rampant and resistant STDs, Pneumocystis, Proctitis, the aforementioned CA-MRSA and more, and this link was was becoming incontrovertible.
Here was yet another organism, treatment-resistant, passed through casual contact (I forbade my son joining a “health club” knowing how these infections spread) and it was coming from the homosexual community, knowledge of which the CDC was protecting by changing the language.
Sure, we couldn’t just hand them all wood blocks to clap as they walked around in public, but knowing the risks, like that recent case of a young porn “actress” who refused to have sex with a homosexual male prostitute, why take unnecessary and potentially life-thretaening chances?
As a physician, infectious disease specialist, this is my story and I’m sticking with it.
I love my President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.