Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong

I stand in judgement of this officer’s behavior and will in no way attempt to excuse the inexcusable as you continue to do. The person whose life was on the line in this instance lost his. The officer’s life was never threatened. This kind of literal injustice will lead to reprisals and vigilantism. You will have had a hand in it. Idiot.


139 posted on 12/10/2017 5:35:58 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry
You will have had a hand in it. Idiot.

Wrong moron. I never defended him nor did I say he was innocent. Unfortunately you are incapable of understanding comments. The only thing I argued against were the claims his commands were incomprehensible and impossible to execute. I still contend that those claims are false. Furthermore, I clearly stated he has no business in law enforcement. In addition I stated that I was shocked, or perhaps I used the word surprised, that he was found not guilty, but that they had. I never said I agreed or disagreed with his form of communication, other than it was clear instructions, as the girl followed them without any problem. I don't know if he was following some kind of protocol from above in the communication technique he employed. So is he solely to blame or does the blame lay with his training? That I don't know, but I think the team needs better training, and that training should include how they follow the techniques they are taught, if these were not the techniques that were taught.

Just a clue, I am not in the least bit intimidated by you, and I certainly am not impressed by you. I will always state my opinion, regardless of how many people disagree with my opinion. It is my right and I will exercise it. When I think I communicated more out of emotion, than with intellect I will admit I am wrong due to the fact my response really stemmed from emotion rather than from a considered intellectual process. In this case I was not speaking from an emotional response because I didn't offer up an opinion on anything definitive except for the claims that his commands were confusing and incapable of being followed. I found those claims to be false, and I still do. Did I personally think they were appropriate? No. Did I think I would have found him innocent had I sat on the jury? Probably not, but it depends if something else was brought up in the trial that we have not been told, that might make me reconsider.

Let it go & move along now.

In other words, never communicate with me again and I will extend the same courtesy to you. You can have the last word if you must, however, I will ignore it.

142 posted on 12/11/2017 4:32:06 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson