there's a good chance several different dates were seeded to different groups of those looking at the emails to narrow down to 1-3 individuals as being the leaker
Posted on 12/09/2017 4:34:05 PM PST by grayboots
Someone needs to splain to me why the date even matters anyway. TALKING TO RUSSIANS IS NOT A CRIME.
The Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) are doing what they accused Joe McCarthy of doing...
Why is this important? If Trump Jr., or Donald Trump his own self, “colluded” with WikiLeaks to tell the people the truth about Hillary, they were just doing their jobs.
CNN will try to turn it around and make it about the White House disseminating false information to Congress. “This is a very serious breach of integrity coming from the President.”
Your post makes me laugh.
Out Loud....
there's a good chance several different dates were seeded to different groups of those looking at the emails to narrow down to 1-3 individuals as being the leaker
No, the funny looking capital B looking letter is the double s. StraBe=strasse
ping
That is one way to catch the leakers. Give each suspected leaker different information and see what comes out. If the leak said Sept 1, it was person X. If the leak said Sept 4, it was person Y.
But I don’t know that this method could work in this particular case - the House members could very easily cross check their documents. Something this “explosive” would raise eyebrows and they would discuss it among themselves and their legal aides and surely someone would notice that they each had different set of documents. In the case of secure document viewing someone would have to change out the document each time a new House member went to view it to pull this off. Not sure how doable that would be.
What’s nice is it gives them probable cause to review the leaker’s phone records and subpoena his texts.
Somewhere between old English and German something that looked like ff was ss. The point being to correctly turn Schiff's name into what he really is.
No. The source intended to leak.
“But I don’t know that this method could work in this particular case - the House members could very easily cross check their documents.”
—
Add in things that likely wouldn’t be double-checked, e.g. find some reason to include a short list of made-up names that would utilize easily overlooked simple misspellings.
for example: “Miltenstein” could show on one copy and as “Milltenstein” or “Miltenstien” on another. Or even common names like “Johnson” could be “Johnsen” on a different copy.
Even if they did compare handouts and saw misspellings, it would likely be ignored as a simple typo and not a sting - unless they were very suspicious.
ping to pencil necked creep
Oh yeah, I got the point about changing the meaning of Schiff’s name to something else. I forgot about the ff from the founding fathers days. I was just pointing out the modern German letter.
Congreff=Congress
LOL, but no, it is the ß that is the ss sound in deutsch.
Does he get 'paid' with positive press?
“his minority ranking on the House Intel Committee”
It’s very simple - if he was the leaker he should be censured & immediately removed from the committee - and not necessarily in that order.
MITCH?!
One dumb Scheiß!
Caption:
“OH NOS!”
“Me have sting and all your stings are belong to US!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.