Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/09/2017 1:31:40 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We’re now getting to the embedded moles.

It will be great to see a Jim Jordan interrogate this little worm, but probably unnecessary. At this point, the entire Mueller frame up operation is exposed and has no more legitimacy.


2 posted on 12/09/2017 1:37:15 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Remember when the story was that McCain gave it to them? Let me remind folks of what Hillary told us in one of her post election interviews. “We literally BEGGED them to investigate.”

I think Hillary gave it to them.


6 posted on 12/09/2017 1:48:03 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach


7 posted on 12/09/2017 1:49:56 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Build Kate's wall! Keep illegals and illegal murderers/criminals out of America! MAGA! SLAP ACT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No one pulls back the curtain of lies better than Greenfield.


13 posted on 12/09/2017 2:03:23 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

0bama didn’t know anything about this until he saw it on the news ... which hasn’t reported it ... so he still doesn’t know anything about it.


22 posted on 12/09/2017 2:18:43 PM PST by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

.


23 posted on 12/09/2017 2:21:34 PM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Don’t forget McCain...That POS is neck deep in this whole mess.


32 posted on 12/09/2017 2:50:54 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A little OT, but does anyone know if Andrew McCabe (FBI) is related to Sam McCabe (Head of Data for the DNC)?

If so, Sam would know who leaked the DNC emails...which I am guessing is the dead guy...Seth Rich.

33 posted on 12/09/2017 2:54:34 PM PST by demsux (The "Mockingbirds" have come home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court

interesting here it says .03 % applications denied, it also states if a judge denies an application and they try again it cannot go to a different judge..

...If an application is denied by one judge of the court, the federal government is not allowed to make the same application to a different judge of the court, but may appeal to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. Such appeals are rare: the first appeal from the FISC to the Court of Review was made in 2002 (In re Sealed Case No. 02-001), 24 years after the founding of the court.
Also rare is for FISA warrant requests to be turned down. During the 25 years from 1979 to 2004, 18,742 warrants were granted, while only four were rejected. Fewer than 200 requests had to be modified before being accepted, almost all of them in 2003 and 2004. The four rejected requests were all from 2003, and all four were partially granted after being submitted for reconsideration by the government. Of the requests that had to be modified, few were before the year 2000. During the next eight years, from 2004 to 2012, there were over 15,100 additional warrants granted, and another seven being rejected. Over the entire 33-year period, the FISA court granted 33,942 warrants, with only 12 denials – a rejection rate of 0.03 percent of the total requests.[5] This does not include the number of warrants that were modified by the FISA court.[6]

...

In November 2016, Louise Mensch reported on the news website Heat Street that, after an initial June 2016 FBI request was denied, the FISA court had granted a more narrowly-focused October request from the FBI “to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia”.[71] On 12 January 2017, BBC journalist Paul Wood reported that, in response to an April 2016 tip from a foreign intelligence agency to the CIA about “money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign”, a joint taskforce had been established including representatives of the FBI, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency; and in June 2016 lawyers from the Department of Justice had applied to the FISA court for “permission to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks”. According to Wood, this application was rejected, as was a more narrowly focused request in July, and the order was FINALLY GRANTED by a DIFFERENT FISA JUDGE on 15 October, three weeks before the presidential election.[72] On January 19 the New York Times reported that one of its sources had claimed “intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House”.[73]

FISA judges are appointed by the chief justice. contreras appointed may 19, 2016

interesting read


34 posted on 12/09/2017 2:59:42 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

McShamey gave it to them. He openly said so


35 posted on 12/09/2017 3:05:38 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Placemark,


40 posted on 12/09/2017 4:18:46 PM PST by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It is maddening to hear, in reference to the DOJ and the FBI’s use of the dossier, the passive phrase “it is wrong” or “it is worse that Watergate.” It is, at the least, an attempt to steal an election, which is treason, and at its worse, an attempted coup against the government and people of the United States.


41 posted on 12/09/2017 4:32:20 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We will know we are getting closer when the bodies start piling up from mysterious deaths, suicides, botched robberies, hunting accidents, bathtub electrocutions...


46 posted on 12/09/2017 6:35:40 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

scratchin my head over this one. I don’t see any event dates in the article.
What exactly is meant by “DOJ” ? anybody not in FBI\CIA\DNI\DHS ?

We know the FBI had the dossier earlier(July 2016) than the McCain handoff.(December 2016)
We know the dossier was in MSM hands at least by July 2016.
CIA gets involved Aug. 2016.

By this time, how in the name of Randolph Scott does DOJ not know the FBI had it ?
(Remember, there were 16 versions of the dossier according to Steele )

here’s a couple of half-way decent timelines that compliment each other.with no mention of DOJ.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/28/finally-a-definitive-timeline-showing-when-clinton-dnc-started-the-russian-dossier/

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-dossier-timeline-whats-known


54 posted on 12/10/2017 9:11:04 AM PST by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson