More likely it was added after Corfman's accusation made news. Nelson would have had no reason to do it when he was running for office in Alabama, even if she still held a grudge about the divorce ruling. But the attack on Moore was already underway. We're in the destroy-Trump era now, and the Senate race is a national race, and it is important to both the Trump agenda and the Trump haters.
Maybe Moore did write the inscription and sign it "Roy" when she worked at the restaurant. But how do you prove it was THAT Roy, at THAT restaurant. I wonder if she first took it to the Washington Post and they said, "Can't use it, doesn't prove anything." So she consults with Allred who says something like, "If it only had his last name..." and Nelson remembers, "Hey, his last name is on my divorce papers." So they concocted to add his last name, the date, and the location. The date and location were ooooooverkill -- tailoring their "evidence" to match up with what was already out. But who signs a yearbook and puts where they are when they sign it?
Nelson is so blinded by her mission, she cannot see how she looks to others, and Allred doesn't care.
Yes but an an officer of the court Allred cannot be involved in this /sarc