Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oshkalaboomboom
There is an important distinction here that the article and many commentators are not making.

In a true surrogacy the child is biologically the husband and wife's. For some reason, the wife cannot carry a child to term. The doctor harvests eggs from the wife and impregnates them in the lab with hubby's sperm. The doctor then implants fertilized eggs in the surrogate. No sex is involved.

On the other hand, if he said, hey wanna have my baby? That is sexual harassment.

The former is inappropriate in the context of approaching young women who report to him and might form the basis for some kind of employment discrimination claim.

That said, the whole story sounds fishy given the age of husband and wife. Makes me think something was going on we don't yet know about.

74 posted on 12/08/2017 1:46:20 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

“The former is inappropriate in the context of approaching young women who report to him and might form the basis for some kind of employment discrimination claim.”

How do you tell the guy who signs your paycheck you dont want to carry his kid for 9 months then go through delivery?The only thing that should be left is a roadrunner cloud where that woman was standing.


135 posted on 12/08/2017 4:20:37 PM PST by Bonemaker (White Southerners have been under attack since 1860.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson