So what? He still signed her yearbook.
Somebody name Roy, or perhaps even Ray, signed her yearbook.
No. He didn’t. “Moore” is in blue ink and the shapes of the letters are different from the letters in the original black portion. The “signature” is limited to “Roy” or “Ray.”
No, there was a Ray in her class and he was attempting a rhyme.
By the way, signing a yearbook does not make anyone a pervert.
“So what? He still signed her yearbook.”
Please tell me you are not as dumb as that makes you seem.
“So what? He still signed her yearbook.”
At the very least it shows an intent to mislead on her part. It’s instant loss of credibility.
So, even though she admits she forged it, it’s still his genuine signature? Why are you so vested in his guilt, that even in light of overwhelming proof of his innocence, you keep insisting on his guilt? What’s your stake in this?
He didn’t sign anything but her divorce papers.
Someone needs to find what school that yearbook is from and look in the archives. My bet is that she has a classmate with either the name Ray, or Roy.
People who either worked at or were regular customers at the restaurant where she claimed to have worked all said that she never worked there and that she got the details of the location wrong.
“So what? He still signed her yearbook.”
1. What if he did? Signing a yearbook is not a crime. It says and means nothing. Who refuses to sign a yearbook if asked?
2. It’s signed by someone named “Ray,” IMO. Not even Ray Moore, let alone Roy Moore.
So I don’t think Roy Moore signed it in any event.