What is amazing is that we saw very little discussion of the free exercise clause of the first amendment which is right on point. This shows you the legal and institutional hostility toward Christianity in this country. The only conceivable “discrimination” in this case was directed against an event not against people - the baker acknowledged he would sell anything in his store to gay customers but he wouldn’t facilitate a gay wedding.
Oral arguments are just a public spectacle. The real arguments are made in the written legal briefs. That’s why Clarence Thomas never asks any questions. He has said these oral arguments are a waste of a judge’s time.