You've only used "troll" three times in two sentences. Try harder.
We’ve had former FAA and NTSB investigators tell us our conclusions are sound
Did they explain how the ninja frogmen were able to keep hidden underwater the mechanic
shop needed to swap the engine in water shallow enough for people to stand in?
If the credibility of the presenter is the whole story then you’re fighting a LOSING battle, HG, because we’ve got the most credible people there are agreeing with us.
Can they explain why it is that a super-secret black-hat operation
has VIDEO and PICTURES of it for you to look at and "expose"?
Good to know they care so much about me that they poisoned my family
They're out to GETCHA!
You still refuse to address the evidence.
As to your questions, the topographical maps and satellite imagery show that there are outcroppings on the ocean floor there. The overall water depth was 9-15 feet deep, but the volcanic rock sometimes has bumps on it that rise high enough to make it possible for a person to stand there. If you had read the book you would know that.
As for the “underwater shop”, Jerry Corsi was told by someone at the salvor’s company that they used a machine to cut the engine and nosepiece free, and that would explain the mismatched several dozen cuts that show up in the NTSB photos. It also would explain the movements of the plane in the water and the sprays seen in the water.
Why was there video taken? ABC was pretty clear about why they aired the video: to try to shut up the questions surrounding Fuddy’s death.
We haven’t been allowed to see the military footage that was most likely one of the reasons for the military airspace being reserved for 3-5pm that day in that area... We’re told we can’t know what operation that was for, because it is too secret. We do know they lied to us about the LaJolla being in the area, until the request was for a timeframe that would allow them to take the standard ZULU reference off of the records and make it seem that the LaJolla wasn’t there until 12 hours AFTER this water landing. Why did they lie to us? They could have said there were records that couldn’t be disclosed for national security reasons, like they did with the records involving the reserved military airspace from 3-5pm that day...
It is a fact that they lied to us.
It is a fact that they removed the ZULU time reference that is required to be on all records of ship movements.
It is a fact that once the ZULU adjustment is made, the LaJolla was ordered to move from an adjacent area into that specific area just before this “crash” happened.
What’s your explanation for why Ferdinand Puentes took and assembled video from 2 Go-Pros, using mounting equipment besides just an arm to hold the camera?
It is a fact that my husband and daughter had massive levels of lead in their body tissues. It is a fact that no environmental sources were found. It is a fact that a Fogbow poster (interested bystander was the alias at the time) tried posting as Zola on my blog, threatening (among other things) that my dear, sweet husband would have to lose his job if I didn’t stop talking about the Fuddy event. This “Zola” also threatened to hack my computer, and not only my computer but also my blog administration were hacked.
Strange, that somebody who so clearly hated me would try to stop me from making a fool of myself and other conservatives by presenting such a crazy, easily-disproven conspiracy theory.
The bad thing for Zola, though, is that the hacking of my email was done at the ISP level, which my IT-doctor friend told me requires high governmental involvement. And those who would know which email to hack, to support the unlawful excuses claimed by the FAA’s top legal expert, were the FAA, my colleague who crafted the FOIA request in the first place, and whoever snooped in my communications and had the knowledge and position to not only delete the “sent” email but also try to use that as a FOIA response’s reason to destroy records.
IOW, what Zola threatened was what happened - both with my computer and with my husband. And what was done to my email was done by somebody at the FAA or one of the federal spy agencies, and was used by the FAA to falsely claim they could legally destroy records. Not something a little ol’ “interested bystander” could accomplish on his/her own. Most likely a deep state operative posing as an “interested bystander”...
Oh - and did I mention that Zola also claimed to be a Freeper pretending to be a friend of the eligibility issue, and having moderation powers? It would seem laughable except that when I was gagged in the middle of the “What Do You See?” thread, interested bystander bragged at fogbow that he/she was giving all her “sockpuppets” (other freepers who are also fogblowers, posing as conservatives at FR while laughing about it at fogbow) a rest for a while. IIRC, the Freepers who had been attacking me like sockpuppets at the time... were you and your friends...