True. But anytime something can be twisted and not be too obvious, then it is stated as fact, so it will warp children and adult perceptions.
“After the death of his wife Martha in 1782, he had a relationship with his slave Sally Hemings and fathered at least one of her children. “
Wrong. It can’t be proven at all. Never will be. It is not fact since it could have been a brother who “fathered” the ONE child that had Jefferson family DNA. The one who was RUMORED to be his son at the time-—to destroy him by his many enemies—had no Jefferson DNA. The rumors were worse than the ones about Judge Moore, but times are just as vicious and mean and ugly as they were in Jefferson’s day.
The Wikipedia article on Jefferson didn’t list that as a young lawyer he created a bill to eliminate slavery when he was in the House of Burgesses. He hated slavery and the evil laws which made him a felon if he attempted to free his slaves. The Marxists leave that little “truth” out so they can tear down America with lies. School books for 8 year olds state that Jefferson was a “hypocrite” because he was an evil SLAVEOWNER and didn’t free his slaves until his death. The warped perceptions are EVIL and a LIE.
WWI false flag and WWII false flag, Russian Revolution and funding of Lenin (not included) -—Just by lying of omission there are so many “facts’ that just are lies or not there. It actually makes me really mad because without accurate information, it is impossible to understand history, so you remain ignorant and can’t learn from history at all.
And this: “Transgender people are sometimes called transsexual if they desire medical assistance to transition from one sex to another.”
There is no possibility of “transition” from one sex to another. This destroys reason and logic and understanding of reality in children. It is DIABOLICAL-—it is better that Wikileaks doesn’t exist then destroy even one child’s ability to “think” and to warp their ideas of human identity.
I could write a book longer than Tolstoy’s just listing all the lies and omissions.
As I said, it’s good for some technical stuff.
But for history and biographical topics not so much.