==
So this is just our lying eyes,then?
I don't care who it is, if we allow women to come forward with DECADES old assertions of sexual misconduct and allow men to be destroyed as a result, than NO MAN IS SAFE!
There is no possible way for a man to defend himself against these charges decades later. Women who legitimately suffer sexual misconduct need to speak up or forever hold their peace. Not come forward decades later because said man is running for political office.
If we allow this to stand, than NO MAN IS SAFE EVER! If we allow men to be destroyed over old allegations that cannot ever be proven then we will have given the media and powers-that-be the power to destroy any man at anytime.
I don’t care who the shitty craphead is, or how much they love their perversion..if they treat a case with photographic evidence the same as some extraneous unsubstantiated bullshit they need to be slapped down both figuratively and literally.
Well, it’s hard to defend yourself after you get someone to take your picture grabbing her boobs.
“NO MAN IS SAFE!”
I have not put myself in a situation where a woman could credibly accuse me, nor a child.
Excepting, I suppose, women I dated and who were willing.
This is Mutually Assured Destruction in play. The first nuke in response was just fired.
I think Bannon may be the guy that fired it. How do you like these apples McConnell?