[Pontiac]

"When the system encounters a dilemma, it essentially holds an election, by deducing the votes of the 1.3 million voters, and applying a voting rule," Procaccia said. He said, "This allows us to give the following strong guarantee: the decision the system takes is likely to be the same as if we could go to each of the 1.3 million voters, ask for their opinions, and then aggregate their opinions into a choice that satisfies mathematical notions of social justice."

They had me going up until those last two words.

It all made sense until they blew it.

[Responsibility2nd]

Indeed.

This entire article is factored on fake science and faulty logic.

If you really fear the autonomous car, then you better never fly.

AI bots and computers have been dominating our airways for years. And soon will be on our roadways.

So. you wanna fear autonomous driving? Then yeah - the “social justice” aspect is your boogie man. The fear that the State will decide when and where you go.

And even that is goofy.

[sonofagun]

“It all made sense until they blew it. “

I agree. Today’s incarnation of “social justice” is Twitter. Look what THAT is doing to politics, news and political correctness.