Posted on 11/13/2017 8:18:20 PM PST by TigerClaws
Known for his insightful take on politics, journalist and author Thomas Wictor believes Judge Roy Moores signature in Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelsons yearbook is a forgery. Wictors shock claim are highlighted by four anomalies laid out below.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
In shaping this narrative to the public at large, it also attempts to make use of Alinsky Rule #4:
Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.The gullible public (and weak-kneed Freepers) who swallow the 40-year-old stories from these likely paid off trollops only help, by their willingness to go-along with these "what if" imaginings, to destroy someone who only wants to work hard at draining The Swamp. But that can't be allowed! No no no!
If The Swamp succeeds and Moore is defeated, we'll learn the truth after-the-fact. It will be too late, of course. One more scalp for The Swamp.
But of course - you were there, right, troll?
Almost fifty years ago.
Fifty years ago, fifteen and sixteen year old Polish girls were engaged to forty year old established men via their club connections. In Connecticut. Urban and suburban.
Almost 50 years ago I at sixteen married a 27 year old man.
Isn’t it amazing that, even were the story true - even IF it were true - the FACT that these things happened 40 YEARS AGO are of no consequence? Of no consequence to certain posters on this thread?
We’re right back to The Swamp’s tactics used against Trump, aren’t we?
A man changes, he finds The Lord, he turns his back to sinful ways, marries, grows in Faith, spends THE REST OF HIS LIFE doing The Lord’s work.
Not one trollop has come forth to say they were molested by Moore last week, or last year, or a few years ago.
Yet, we are told to judge him by sins of the past.
This makes him tainted goods? Unfit for the Senate?
Well, I’ll admit, by the current standards of the Senate, a Godly man is certainly “unfit”. That’s why they are Hellbent (word chosen properly) to destroy him.
But of course - you were there, right, troll?
==
You surely stand alone, as an exemplary participant in the World of FR. I salute! you.
And you, troll, unfortunately, are legion.
Exactly!
Geez.
Then her whole story is a bald lie. You know, the other stories told of a quiet man who never pushed the girls, and this one like I said yesterday had him acting like Ted Bundy, locking them in his car and forcing oral sex. And her theatrics. 40 years later. Riiiight.
Would be funny if it were signed "moop."
That was sick, but funny. Dirty ol’ Uncle Joe. LOL!!
Or "Rob Mook."
Gloria’s are surely all over it now...somebody needs to lock her up already.
If I'm seeing the high resolution photo from the CNN twitter feed properly (https://twitter.com/CNN/status/930205088299257859)...
...it looks like somebody named "Roy" signed the yearbook with a black ink pen, and then somebody added "Moore" and the rest with a blue ink pen!
The photo is cited and accessible from the CNN twitter link above. It looks legitimate to me. The darker photo that you both linked do not show this color detail.
-PJ
It’s forged anyway, so I’ll quit analyzing it. What I DO want to know is why are there no autographs or signatures on the page her photo is on?
I’m sick of your negative comments about this race. You are not an Alabamian, so SHUT UP sir.
Look at the y in Merry. Then look at the Y in Hickory. Nothing alike. More should hire a renouned forgery expert who would immediately expose this Yearbook note as being fraud. Moore didnt write any of it. Some guy named Ray did, then the smitten damsel in disgress I would suspect forged the rest because she was obsessed with the young Asst county DA.
just saw the wictor story on OAN.i wonder if any other network will carry this?
In the above, the autograph color shift is absent or different, and her nail polish is much darker. Also, in the photo above, the building looks appears in true gray scale, without the bluish tint in the first photo.
Here's a third photo from the same presser:
Skin tone lighter. Nail polish lighter, but not as light as in the first photo. Autograph color uniform. Building in normal gray scale.
Your signature hasn't changed in decades?
I don't know what the truth is and who's lying and who's telling the truth, but I suspect professional handwriting analysis is more complicated than what we amateurs come up with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.