You’re trying to prove your point by tailoring circumstances to narrowly fit your argument.
Nobody said if he’s sitting in a restaurant 50 years after the fact you could walk up and pop him. He literally just stopped shooting people and started walking away. He still may have been armed. He still posed a credible threat. That’s why it is legal to pursue and use lethal force.
Absent his total compliance, there’s easily a justifiable reason to shoot him as he’s fleeing.
I have seen more than one post on this that has said there are NO LIMITATIONS on killing a killer in Texas and I am just showing one such example.
btw, I didn’t say 50 years after the fact. I said just killed 50 people.
You find him sitting in Mcdonalds table eating a burger 15 minutes later a citizen can’t execute him just because he just killed 50 people.