To: Cheerio
For starters, he was appointed in violation of the law for special counsels, which requires evidence of a crime. There was no crime they were hired to investigate, it was a national security investigation.
8 posted on
11/04/2017 8:16:28 AM PDT by
Defiant
(It's not antifa, it's actually antifafa. Antifa Fascists.)
To: Defiant
For starters, he was appointed in violation of the law for special counsels, which requires evidence of a crime. There was no crime they were hired to investigate, it was a national security investigation. Absolutely. Not to mention, his uncapped budget means Mueller would require approval for his appointment from the full Senate. Neither of these issues is mentioned in the article, of course.
11 posted on
11/04/2017 8:19:52 AM PDT by
Golden Eagle
(Seeking the Light)
To: Defiant
For starters, he was appointed in violation of the law for special counsels, which requires evidence of a crime. There was no crime they were hired to investigate, it was a national security investigation
Seems to me that he has an open investigation into "INDICTING TRUMP" despite these conflicting opinions/facts.
CR
WaPo
NYSlimes
21 posted on
11/04/2017 11:44:49 AM PDT by
Cheerio
(#44, The unknown President)
To: Defiant
I wonder if Mueller has a portrait of Joseph Stalin in his office. He is following Stalin’s maxim: “Give me the man and I will find the crime.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson