Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

He’d basically have to convince a judge that the lawyer was committing a crime with the client. That is pretty intense. No word on the lawyer who is alleged to be a criminal.


66 posted on 10/31/2017 5:32:40 PM PDT by Defiant (It's not antifa, it's actually antifafa. Antifa Fascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant

Rumor is Melissa Laurenza.

It is a heavy burden..and thus noteworthy ..

Here are some possibilities

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-crime-fraud-exception-the-attorney-client-privilege.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-willing-to-use-suspects-lawyers-against-them/2017/10/31/6b09e98a-be6f-11e7-959c-fe2b598d8c00_story.html?utm_term=.77d865bb450c

“Hardy said the use of what lawyers call the “crime-fraud exception’’ indicates “the special counsel team is highly intelligent, highly aggressive, and they’re going to pursue legal theories that your average prosecutor will not use. Will they use the specific theory again? It’s certainly possible.’’


70 posted on 10/31/2017 5:42:49 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Defiant

Not a Judge, just the Obama appointed affirmative action diversity 1st DC Judge.


76 posted on 10/31/2017 5:51:17 PM PDT by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdzcm,.dadfjl,dz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson