[Be Careful]

It seems like Trump would have nothing to lose with this strategy....those who hate him and want to 'get' him can't hate him or be activated against him any more than they already are.

I like it

[MPJackal]

Seems like a bad idea. Makes the accusations look valid.

[Chode]

to anyone involved with Russian acquisition of an American uranium company during the Obama administration,

[FreeReign]

Mr. Trump can end this madness by immediately issuing a blanket presidential pardon... to anyone involved with Russian acquisition of an American uranium company during the Obama administration

Hillary Clinton should be pardoned?

I suspect somebody, through the WSJ, is trying to offer Trump a deal.

The answer should be NO!

[kingu]

WSJ would like nothing better than to have an open field in both parties for the 2020 presidential nomination.

This is how you’d do it.

[be-baw]

Very bad idea. It would make Trump party to the swamp. Makes me think the WSJ is trying to bait Trump into doing something stupid.

[Henchster]

If the Wall Street Journal and National Review want the investigation shut down, it is because they’re worried Mueller might be getting close to indicting their friend Hillary.

[Jyotishi]

Obama’s interference in Israel and the UK should also be investigated.

[Vermont Lt]

Trump should cooperate, and then shut up and do his job.

No pardons. No get out of jail Bullshit.

It’s time we had a grownup in charge. I did not send him to D.C. To pardon anyone. I sent him to change stuff.

[Signalman]

Trump can end this madness by immediately issuing a blanket presidential pardon to anyone involved in supposed collusion with Russia or Russians during the 2016 presidential campaign, to anyone involved with Russian acquisition of an American uranium company during the Obama administration

No way. Why should the Clintons, Holder and the others who sold out America's security get off Scott free? The Rosenberg went to the chair for what the did.

[NRx]

Insanely bad idea. Could he do it? Yes. But it would provoke a constitutional crisis and might cause enough defections in Congress that could end in impeachment.

[bgill]

No. The msm would never let go of the “he’s hiding something” headlines.

[buffaloguy]

Mueller getting too close to Hillary?

[Lurker]

“to anyone involved with Russian acquisition of an American uranium company during the Obama administration,”

No effing way.

L

[Jackson Brown]

I can understand your point of view. However, it would drive home the notion that there are two sets of laws for the well connected and Powerful ... and ... for the rest of us.

That’s already the belief of a great many people in this country. It would be best if something was done to reverse what is now probably a fact.

[conservative98]

Just wait it out. Gen Kelly says its going to end soon.

[Az Joe]

Trump would never do it.

[Alberta's Child]

The Wall Street Journal has been openly anti-Trump since he won the GOP nomination last year.

I really have to question their motivations when they post articles and op-ed pieces with this kind of "advice" to the Trump administration.

[shoe212]

Trump should leverage the situation and say, “If Democrats doing the same sorts of things are not indicted/tried then I would have to pardon the Republicans, just in the interest of fairness of results.”
Looks fairer and would put pressure on special counsel to be unbiased.

[KyCats]

Stupid idea. Why would he want to issue a blanket pardon to a bunch of criminal democrats?

[faithhopecharity]

Trump can and should fire Mueller for filing on such trivial matters.... while leaving SorozNazi HilLIARy Obama DWS-DNC free to walk the streets

close down the current bs.... and
then hire a real honest person to head up a real honest investigation of the most serious damage, criminal and treasonous conduct of the Soroz/Obama/HilLIARy crowd.