Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

But my point is there needs to be some confirmation from those agencies and not through the “leak process”.


49 posted on 10/25/2017 8:30:04 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: shotgun
Word of advice:

Whenever you see a story about an investigation that is based on a "leak," you should assume that there's at least a 95% chance (probably closer to 99.9% in the Justice Department under Trump) that one of the following is the case:

1. The "leak" is from a person who is actually a target of the investigation and is leaking the information for the sole purpose of making it look like the DOJ is leaking it.

2. The "leak" was from a source inside the DOJ who is deliberately feeding misinformation to the media.

51 posted on 10/25/2017 8:34:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson