Wasn’t it you who said what would happen to North Korea if it dared attack the U. S.? I sure thought it was. You named the trade off. I didn’t.
It was as if you thought this would prevent Kim from attacking us. LOL This is a man who is starving his own citizens. He isn’t rational.
He’s now down to limiting petrol to only his top government workers. Rational?
Now you get upset because I called you on the trade off.
You need to think about what you post before you make a fool out of yourself, not afterward.
Jimmy, I guess it was you. What are you doing on a forum that cares about its citizens enough to support taking preventative action to protect them?
It wasn’t a “trade off” as you falsely claim, it was a statement of fact.
Think of it as an “if...then” statement.
IF Rocket Man launches an EMP attack, THEN the US will respond in a way that will be devastating for NK.
Do you think that an EMP attack would neutralize our ability to respond? Trust me, it won’t. And that will be the worst of any number of possible outcomes.
How in the world did you come to the conclusion that I PREFERRED that outcome? I repeat, I said NOTHING of the sort.
I did not say, nor did I imply, that I thought our guaranteed response would deter Rocket Man. That would deter a sane man, but Rocket Man is nuts. Crazy people don’t act in a rational way. At least we agree on that point.
And when have I ever said, or even implied, that I don’t support preemptive action?
Please stop the lying and childish name calling.