Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sessions: Justice Will Review Concerns About Russian Payments to Clintons...
FREE BEACON ^ | October 18, 2017 | Susan Crabtree

Posted on 10/18/2017 1:01:15 PM PDT by dontreadthis

FULL TITLE:Sessions: Justice Will Review Concerns About Russian Payments to Clintons Before Uranium Deal with Putin Attorney General Jeff Sessions declined to confirm or deny whether or not the Justice Department is investigating if Russian payments to the Clintons improperly influenced a decision by the Obama administration to approve a Russian takeover of a U.S. uranium mine.

In response to questioning by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) during a Wednesday Judiciary Committee hearing, Sessions said only that the Justice Department would "take such actions as is appropriate."

"Mr. Chairman, we will hear your concerns. The Department of Justice will take such actions as is appropriate, I know," Sessions said, noting that "some people involved have gone to jail in that transaction already."

"Without confirming or denying the existence of any particular investigation, I would say I hear your concerns and they will be reviewed," he added.

Grassley, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, is demanding more answers about the Russian takeover of a U.S. uranium mine—a sale approved during the Obama administration.

That sale, which gave Moscow control of more than 20 percent of U.S. uranium, is under new scrutiny after Tuesday reports that the FBI was investigating the Russian nuclear agency that acquired the uranium mine for a global bribery scheme before the sale was approved and that key members of Congress were not informed about the Russian scheme.

The reports noted that the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars from Russian parties with ties to the transaction.

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, along with then-Attorney General Eric Holder, served on one of the agencies that approved the sale between Uranium One and Rosatom, a Russian state-owned nuclear agency. That agency is the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

Grassley wants to know if CFIUS and other U.S. agencies that signed off on the transaction were aware of the criminal FBI probe into a Russian bribery scheme. As attorney general, Holder would have known about the FBI probe.

He also pressed Sessions on whether he believed it would be proper for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to conduct any review or investigation of the Obama administration's handling of the uranium sale to the Russians. Rosenstein was the U.S. attorney in Maryland that investigated and prosecuted the Russian bribery scheme.

Sessions said that decision would be Rosenstein's to make, although he said he hoped that he would consult senior Justice Department ethics officials.

"It would be his decision, he is a man of integrity and ability," Sessions said. "If he feels that he has an inability to proceed with this investigation, it would be his responsibility to make that determination and should consult as I told you I would, as I have done, with the senior ethics committee at the department."

Grassley also highlighted the millions the Clinton Foundation received from "interested parties in the transaction," as well as a $500,000 payment former President Bill Clinton received for a speech in Moscow before a Russian-government aligned bank. Grassley noted that Clinton speech took place the same month the Russians began the process of acquiring the U.S. uranium mine.

"This fact-pattern raises serious concerns about the improper influence on the process by the previous—by the Clintons during the Obama administration," Grassley said. "Has the Justice Department fully investigated whether the Russians compromised the Obama administration's decision to smooth the way for this transaction? And if not, why not?"

Sessions responded that it would be inappropriate to disclose whether the Justice Department is looking into those payments to the Clintons.

"Mr. Chairman, we are working hard to maintain discipline in the department—it wouldn't be appropriate for me to comment on any ongoing investigations," he said.

Two years ago and again last week, Grassley said he wrote to the Justice Department about Russia's acquisition of Uranium One.

"It turns out that during the transaction, the Justice Department had an ongoing criminal investigation for bribery, extortion, and money laundering into officials for the Russian company making that purchase," Grassley said at the start of the Judiciary Committee hearing.

"Russians involved in the conspiracy were reportedly coordinating with high-level officials close to Vladimir Putin," he added.

While this FBI probe was going on, he noted, the Clinton Foundation reportedly received millions of dollars from interested parties in the transaction.

"Then-Secretary Clinton's State Department was one of the agencies that gave a thumb's up to the takeover. Somehow, despite all this, the Obama administration approved the transaction," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agsessions; agsessionshearing; cfius; fbidirectormueller; hillaryrussia; rosenstein; russiabriberyscandal; sessions; uraniumone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: little jeremiah

“Sessions is not going to reveal anything about any ongoing or potential investigation just to satisfy people on FR or anywhere else if revealing stuff would jeopardize said invesgtations. It’s really simple, I don’t get why so many people don’t get it.”

Perhaps if Sessions didn’t almost immediately recuse himself and scamper off to the tall weeds when the enemy invented the noise about Russia and collusion, folks would have a higher degree of confidence. That part virtually EVERYONE gets here in FR.


81 posted on 10/18/2017 3:20:09 PM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberals, go find another country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

‘When it looked like Trump was going to fire him, lindsay graham came out & said “There will be hell to pay” if he does.’

One writer—I wish I could remember who—said Graham was so worked up he practically had blood squirting from his eyes. It was a good and accurate description.


82 posted on 10/18/2017 3:31:01 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Thank you. I believe they are holding their cards close to the vest and when it breaks.. it will break big. It’s all in the timing....


83 posted on 10/18/2017 3:45:50 PM PDT by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Guardian Sebastian

We all know what the Clinton’s got out of this deal. What did Holder or others involved get?

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

That is a great question.

My bet is everyone on the committee got a taste


84 posted on 10/18/2017 3:48:44 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Ruh Roh!


85 posted on 10/18/2017 3:51:47 PM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonny7797

His reply sounds exactly like what Holder or Lynch would say.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Right outta hildabeast DNC playbook: “that matter was completely litigated long ago”


86 posted on 10/18/2017 3:57:00 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Jonny7797

His reply sounds exactly like what Holder or Lynch would say.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Right outta hildabeast DNC playbook: “that matter was completely litigated long ago”


87 posted on 10/18/2017 3:59:06 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

How about “Appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into Russian ‘donations’ to The Clinton Foundation”?


I hope you don’t mind if I repeat your question.

A few times.

How about “Appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into Russian ‘donations’ to The Clinton Foundation”?

How about “Appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into Russian ‘donations’ to The Clinton Foundation”?

How about “Appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into Russian ‘donations’ to The Clinton Foundation”?

How about “Appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into Russian ‘donations’ to The Clinton Foundation”?


88 posted on 10/18/2017 4:08:11 PM PDT by samtheman (As an oil exporter, why would the Russians prefer Trump to Hillary? (Get it or be stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Good work!!!


89 posted on 10/18/2017 4:22:53 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

He recused himself for a very good reason that has been explained numerous times.

I guess people who think Sessions should announce with banners and trumpets what and who he is investigating, what he’s found so far, where the thing’s going and so on or he’s doing “nothing”, must also think Trump is stupid for picking him in the first place or not firing him.

I trust Trump’s judgement and knowledge of what’s going on a lot more than people sitting behind keyboards who are singing “I WANT IT ALL AND I WANT IT NOW!”

People need to realize that Trump himself has quoted directly from Sun Tzu’s Art of War and follows it constantly, and I have no doubt that Sessions is also using tactics so that the actual enemies have no clue what he’s up to.

If I’m proven wrong, and Sessions is a wikmp, a fool and a swamp creature, I will publicly admit it.


90 posted on 10/18/2017 4:26:35 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: right way right

Drudge has it in red now.


91 posted on 10/18/2017 4:26:40 PM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

review, poppycock


92 posted on 10/18/2017 4:33:00 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (Trump plays chess the rest are still playing checkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I trust Trump’s judgment, and as such, his high level of frustration at Sessions was warranted.


93 posted on 10/18/2017 4:50:54 PM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberals, go find another country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
DOJ is going to review “the concerns.” That doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.

Not as much as a stern letter for sure.

94 posted on 10/18/2017 4:51:11 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Southnsoul

“Sessions praising Rosenstein”

I noticed that too. He is the one Sessions will probably assign to “review” the deal. Isn’t “review” such a killer verb? You just know he plans to set the woods on fire with that type drastic assignment.


95 posted on 10/18/2017 4:54:50 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Review = birdglasses. Observe cute songbird wrens, not diving rapacious hawks. Need to see a swing of his binocs to JUSTICE *tomorrow*.


96 posted on 10/18/2017 5:01:49 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Rosenstein is the #2 at DOJ. Not only does he handle more of the day to day operations, he is the equivalent of Acting Attorney General when it comes to Russia and Hillary.

https://www.justice.gov/jmd/organization-mission-and-functions-manual-attorney-general

...The major functions of the DAG are to:

Exercise all the power and authority of the Attorney General unless any such power or authority is required by law to be exercised by the Attorney General personally or has been specifically delegated exclusively to another Department official...

...Be responsible for all DOJ attorney personnel matters, including final action in matters pertaining to the employment, separation, and discipline...


97 posted on 10/18/2017 5:04:56 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris; TheTimeOfMan; ScottinVA; Roman_War_Criminal; Liz; MayflowerMadam

The fact that former FBI Director Mueller, now the Special Counsel, Rod Rosenstein my Deputy, who was US Attorney during this cover up of the Russian uranium bribery allegation and who appointed Mueller as Special Counsel when I recused myself, and James Comey, former FBI Director under Obama and a witness for Mr. Mueller's anticipated prosecutions, who are all now also colluding to target President Trump, his family, and his associates......these are all "Concerns" and I will "Address" them. I will address the concerns. With lots and lots of concern, will I address them. Address the Concerns. That's what I will do.


98 posted on 10/18/2017 5:14:57 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: odawg
“Sessions praising Rosenstein” I noticed that too. He is the one Sessions will probably assign to “review” the deal.

Count on it.


99 posted on 10/18/2017 5:17:24 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Behind the Blue Wall
But I can’t say that I saw it coming, seemed like a great choice.

We all loved him because he wanted to enforce immigration law, at least he said he did.

He now seems very reluctant to enforce law against those that encourage illegals through Sanctuary declarations, a clear violation of Federal Law and it carries jail time which is probably why he won't mention it.

100 posted on 10/18/2017 5:40:57 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson