Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shethink13
You obviously missed my point. I was responding to a poster who suggested that Toomey only won because of Trump's "coattails" in Pennsylvania.

You're not winning on another candidate's "coattails" if you attract different voters than he did.

98 posted on 10/17/2017 9:16:14 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child; Mariner
You obviously missed my point. I was responding to a poster who suggested that Toomey only won because of Trump's "coattails" in Pennsylvania.

You're not winning on another candidate's "coattails" if you attract different voters than he did.

I understood your point completely. You said that Toomey won because of a different demographic and also stated that the rural dems who voted for Trump didn't vote for Toomey. But you can't possibly know that, can you?

Mariner merely suggested the coattails. You, on the other hand, reject the possibility without fact or local perspective.

100 posted on 10/17/2017 9:30:44 AM PDT by Shethink13 (there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
You're not winning on another candidate's "coattails" if you attract different voters than he did.

Would they have won if Trump voters had not vote for them? Not likely. Trump attracted a lot of disaffected democrats and the non voting block of independents.

I said all along that Trump won mostly because he was not one of them.

103 posted on 10/17/2017 10:25:44 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson