To: Shethink13
You obviously missed my point. I was responding to a poster who suggested that Toomey only won because of Trump's "coattails" in Pennsylvania.
You're not winning on another candidate's "coattails" if you attract different voters than he did.
98 posted on
10/17/2017 9:16:14 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
To: Alberta's Child; Mariner
You obviously missed my point. I was responding to a poster who suggested that Toomey only won because of Trump's "coattails" in Pennsylvania. You're not winning on another candidate's "coattails" if you attract different voters than he did.
I understood your point completely. You said that Toomey won because of a different demographic and also stated that the rural dems who voted for Trump didn't vote for Toomey. But you can't possibly know that, can you?
Mariner merely suggested the coattails. You, on the other hand, reject the possibility without fact or local perspective.
100 posted on
10/17/2017 9:30:44 AM PDT by
Shethink13
(there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
To: Alberta's Child
You're not winning on another candidate's "coattails" if you attract different voters than he did. Would they have won if Trump voters had not vote for them? Not likely. Trump attracted a lot of disaffected democrats and the non voting block of independents.
I said all along that Trump won mostly because he was not one of them.
103 posted on
10/17/2017 10:25:44 AM PDT by
itsahoot
(As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson