Reminds me that in the Duke lacrosse case, the entire team was tested
for DNA and none from anyone was found on their accuser; but the DNA of eleven or more other men (none lacrosse players) WAS found on the accuser (owing, no doubt, to her alleged line of work).
But what did it matter? The elites wanted their perfect PC-narrative of rich white kids abusing a poor black woman, so the charges were not dismissed;
even after one of the accused showed via photos he was not present
at the time of the alleged rape;
nor after it was shown the accuser had made a previous claim of being raped by three men in a bathroom;
nor after the accuser was unable to ID anyone after several photo IDs;
etc. etc. etc.
Nothing was going to permit lacrosse players to be innocent, even if the crime never happened.
“DNA samples taken from both suspects came back as a match when compared to the rape kits,” a law enforcement source said.”
okay but the DA was thrown out later with the case. Not a fair comparison at all.