Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Matt Damon, Russell Crowe Reportedly Helped Kill a 2004 New York Times Harvey Weinstein Article
New York Magazine ^ | October 9, 2017 | Tolly Wright

Posted on 10/09/2017 11:31:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Though the New York Times has been widely celebrated for its article exposing decades of sexual-harassment accusations against Harvey Weinstein, one journalist claims the paper sat on an earlier article detailing the producer’s misconduct. Sharon Waxman, founder of the Wrap, writes that her own investigate reporting, which took her on an international trip to uncover rumors of Weinstein’s sexual misconduct, was cut from the Times in 2004 under pressure from several Hollywood elites. Waxman alleges in the Wrap that Matt Damon and Russell Crowe called her “directly” to dispel the reports she was following about Miramax’s Italian head Fabrizio Lombardo, who was allegedly hired “to take care of Weinstein’s women needs.” She says that because of their influence, and interference from Weinstein, whose company was a big advertiser in the Times, the article was edited to remove the more salacious details. Damon and Crowe had previously worked with Weinstein on pictures like Good Will Hunting, Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, and Cinderella Man.

Waxman claims that the gutted story could have exposed Weinstein much earlier. “I had people on the record telling me Lombardo knew nothing about film, and others citing evenings he organized with Russian escorts,” Waxman said. She also alleges that she tracked down an intern in London who had been paid off in a settlement with Weinstein. “I was devastated after traveling to two countries and overcoming immense challenges to confirm at least part of the story that wound up running last week, more than a decade later,” she writes.

Update: On Monday, the Times’ Executive Editor Dean Baquet replied to Sharon Waxman’s claim that the paper had “gutted” her 2004 report on Harvey Weinstein, denying that the paper would have declined to print a negative story simply because Weinstein was an advertiser. Instead, Baquet suggests, Waxman’s own description of her report reveals it consisted largely of “an off-the-record account from one woman.” You can read his full statement below:

I wasn’t here in 2004. But it is unimaginable to me that The Times killed a story because of pressure from Harvey Weinstein, who was and is an advertiser. After all, The Times is an institution that has published investigative reporting that caused our Chinese-language website to be blocked in China.

The top two editors at the time, Bill Keller and Jill Abramson, say they have no recollection of being pressured over Ms. Waxman’s story. And her direct editor, Jonathan Landman, suggested she didn’t have it nailed. The story we published last week took months of work by two experienced investigative reporters. It included the on-the-record accounts of numerous women who were harassed by Mr. Weinstein. It also included the fact that Mr. Weinstein paid settlements to keep women from talking. I’m sure Ms. Waxman believes she had a story. But if you read her own description, she did not have anything near what was revealed in our story. Mainly, she had an off-the-record account from one woman.

Vulture has reached out to representatives for Matt Damon and Russell Crowe for a comment. This post will be updated if more information becomes available.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fabriziolombardo; harveyweinstein; mattdamon; media; msm; russellcrowe; weinstein

1 posted on 10/09/2017 11:31:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I love it. Matt Damon getting knocked off his moral high horse onto his smarmy ass.


2 posted on 10/09/2017 11:34:12 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (I'm tired of the Cult of Clinton. Wish she would just pass out the Koolaide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Is he the one with slave-owning ancestors?


3 posted on 10/09/2017 11:35:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No, that’s his butt-buddy Ben Afflict.


4 posted on 10/09/2017 11:39:03 PM PDT by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Uh oh. Russian prostitutes.


5 posted on 10/09/2017 11:39:50 PM PDT by jean michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t know about that, I just know he’s an arrogant condescending little p#$%k.


6 posted on 10/09/2017 11:40:25 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (I'm tired of the Cult of Clinton. Wish she would just pass out the Koolaide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Waxman alleges in the Wrap that Matt Damon and Russell Crowe called her “directly” to dispel the reports she was following about Miramax’s Italian head Fabrizio Lombardo, who was allegedly hired “to take care of Weinstein’s women needs.”

And the accomplices begin to emerge. . .When there's a guy like Weinstein, there's always a procurer network.

7 posted on 10/09/2017 11:56:16 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Sharon Waxman, "Miramax Sues Ex-Chief in Italy, Saying He Had 2 Jobs" (12/23/2004)

The Miramax Films division of the Walt Disney Company is seeking compensation from the former head of its short-lived Miramax Italy office, claiming the executive, a longtime friend of the company's co-chairman, Harvey Weinstein, held another full-time job simultaneously.

Miramax kept the executive, Fabrizio Lombardo, on its payroll for months after closing the Italy office in August 2003. The company continued to pay Mr. Lombardo -- with checks written by the Walt Disney Italy division -- because it was negotiating a settlement and was required to do so by Italian labor law, a company spokesman said.

According to an executive who has seen the internal payroll records, Mr. Lombardo was paid 335,895 euros, or $403,000, from Nov. 1, 2003, to July 31, 2004, based on an average exchange rate from the first half of 2004. Miramax executives disputed that account, saying the company last paid him in March 2004, seven months after the Italian division closed.

Mr. Lombardo's salary, while not high by movie industry standards, placed him in the upper ranks at Miramax, according to former company executives.

A Disney spokeswoman said the executives of the parent company were not aware of Miramax's dispute with Mr. Lombardo. . .

8 posted on 10/10/2017 12:01:05 AM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Anyone involved in killing that story is complicit in any sexual abuse that followed.


9 posted on 10/10/2017 1:39:57 AM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zencycler

Disney and ESPN are really dirty in many ways. They have been since the atheists took over the corporations.


10 posted on 10/10/2017 3:09:09 AM PDT by doosee (Captain, we are approaching a new level of Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jean michael

“Uh oh, Russian prostitutes”

Weinstein hired them to urinate on a bed Trump once slept in.


11 posted on 10/10/2017 3:33:54 AM PDT by I-ambush (If we make it, we'll all sit back and laugh, but I fear tomorrow I'll be crying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Update: On Monday, the Times’ Executive Editor Dean Baquet replied to Sharon Waxman’s claim that the paper had “gutted” her 2004 report on Harvey Weinstein, denying that the paper would have declined to print a negative story simply because Weinstein was an advertiser. Instead, Baquet suggests, Waxman’s own description of her report reveals it consisted largely of “an off-the-record account from one woman.” You can read his full statement below: I wasn’t here in 2004. But it is unimaginable to me that The Times killed a story because of pressure from Harvey Weinstein, who was and is an advertiser.

Almost funny... "It is unimaginable"??? The NYT 'imagines' all kinds of things about Trump, conservatives, Republicans, white people, etc. But when their bottom line is threatened they "can't imagine" that they reacted in such a way as to protect it?

12 posted on 10/10/2017 3:39:20 AM PDT by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What was the scandal with Russell Crow? He came back. Maybe Harvey smoothed the path for him and he owed him. Liberals stick together. Unacceptable for all these leftists to be so fake outraged at Trump’s tape comments. Their only real outrage is that he isn’t a fellow traveler.


13 posted on 10/10/2017 4:29:01 AM PDT by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds like they aided and abetted this scumbag producer. GUILTY.


14 posted on 10/10/2017 4:47:15 AM PDT by Maudeen (This world is not my home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Is this an indication that Clintons’ influence is waning? When powerful people start to crumble, their close associates are usually the first to go down. Their boss can no longer cover for them.
15 posted on 10/10/2017 7:04:07 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The Matt Damons of this world cause much grief.
I bet he will not be asked on any tv show he is on about this.


16 posted on 10/10/2017 1:39:18 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outinyellowdogcountry

What was the scandal with Russell Crow? He came back. Maybe Harvey smoothed the path for him and he owed him. Liberals stick together


Russell Crowe is also a notorious groper/sexual harasser, especially when he’s drunk (and apparently he’s drunk a lot). He and Harvey have a lot in common.


17 posted on 10/10/2017 1:43:52 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

How do you like them apples, Matt?

Libtards have nothing on conservative politicians as hypocrites.


18 posted on 10/10/2017 4:25:41 PM PDT by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson