“Right now we believe it is sole actor, a lone wolf type actor and we have the place under control.”
Seems kind of quick for the police to come to the conclusion it was a lone wolf, even if they know the identity of the shooter (Stephen Paddock? or Geary Danley?).
It may have been a single shooter, but that does not mean there were not others assisting.
Questions I have:
Witness on Fox says windows broken by gun fire and calls 911 - can’t get through.
Multiple witness claim that gun fire went on for “two minutes”.
So cops, responded (most likely on the property), noted the correct floor, rode an elevator to the 32nd floor, found the correct room and breached to door and shot a guy with a clearly FA weapon? Not buying that scenario. Need more info. Reminds me of the first season of “Shooter”.
The police are completely irresponsible when they make these lone wolf statements. Yes they may be correct he was the lone shooter, but very possible someone was aiding and abetting. You’d need a forensic IT team to search the guys phone, computer, email and social media accounts, as well as a boots on the ground police investigation of banking transactions, recent travel, interview of witnesses, before you could make such a definitive statement.