Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Gamgee

Corporate taxes just get passed on to consumers. Besides, whether or not the “super rich” get a little richer is less important than whether or not average folks can get good paying jobs with a future.

I might not mind seeing some form of tax “reward” for actually creating stable jobs, provided the employee is not laid off over some extended period. Unfortunately, I want to see a big decrease in the total size of the tax code, so adding another “incentive” counters that.


269 posted on 09/28/2017 12:42:57 AM PDT by Paul R. (I don't want to be energy free, we want to be energy dominant in terms of the world. -D. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: Paul R.

When corporations try to pass on taxes to consumers of their exports, they are told sorry, I’ll buy that from Korea or Japan or Thailand.


314 posted on 09/28/2017 8:18:01 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

To: Paul R.

Yes, and perhaps to the shareholder too. Maybe hitting the SALARY of the CEO would hurt them more directly?


344 posted on 09/28/2017 11:35:11 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson