To: sukhoi-30mki; MeganC; Army Air Corps; GraceG
Very Interesting, Ping for your interest.
2 posted on
09/19/2017 8:10:19 PM PDT by
KC_Lion
(If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, what the hell? It's far beyond time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon. Lets do it...
President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America
President Donald J. Trump's address to the United Nations on 09/19/2017.
Ramirez political cartoon: United and Undaunted LARGE VERSION 09/19/2017: LINK LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Garrison political cartoon: United and Undaunted LARGE VERSION 09/19/2017: LINK LINK (scroll down) to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic. If you opt not to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project. LINK
FReepers, 92.79% of the Third Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met. Click above and pencil in your donation now. Please folks, lets end this FReepathon. Thank you!
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...
Just $183.00 dollars and cents to 93.00%
3 posted on
09/19/2017 8:12:13 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I always enjoy your military hardware posts sukhoi-30mki...
4 posted on
09/19/2017 8:12:57 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
A dangerous potential adversary , no doubt. But happily for the West, the heritage of the Russian Navy is lackluster at best.
5 posted on
09/19/2017 8:20:42 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Back in the olden days we were taught to fear these ships.
High respect.
6 posted on
09/19/2017 8:28:22 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: sukhoi-30mki
That ship class has been stunning for a long time. Have to be hideously expensive to keep running, as often as they are in the yard.
To: sukhoi-30mki
Actually while these rockets are dangerous they are not stealthy and are outdated. A supercarrier has much more to fear from innovative technology such as stealthy flocks of “seagull” drones. Each less than a foot long, armed with C4 explosive, launched far from target and directed to target from a console far away. Sorry but in the era of modern technology big surface ships are obsolete and vulnerable death traps for their crews.
8 posted on
09/19/2017 9:04:27 PM PDT by
allendale
(.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
[ 1,650 high explosive charge or a 500kt thermonuclear warhead. In the case of the former, a near miss is still a certain kill, although it’s very unlikely that the Russians still deploy these missiles loaded with nuclear warheads. ]
In the case of the latter.
9 posted on
09/19/2017 9:24:26 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Looks like the Rooskies need some high temp marine paint.
What ever happened to the supersonic torpedos?
10 posted on
09/19/2017 9:28:59 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Big looking ship, beautiful lines and powerful. But an Iowa battleship is over twice the size.
13 posted on
09/19/2017 9:50:10 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Yeah, I'm sure Phalanx CIWS could never hit an incoming platform moving on a nearly constant radial with a frontal area that appears to be about the size of a semi, moving at less than Mach 2.
16 posted on
09/19/2017 10:21:30 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: sukhoi-30mki
I’m sure that ship will always have at least 1 of our nuclear attack subs watching her 24x7 silently.
21 posted on
09/20/2017 1:17:52 AM PDT by
prophetic
(Trump is today's DANIEL. Rooting out the evils in Babylon but they will be the catfood at the end!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The Russians have more to fear from a ramming by the US Navy than our carriers.
28 posted on
09/20/2017 5:42:08 AM PDT by
Mashood
To: sukhoi-30mki
SS-N-19 has a range of 338 miles. At mach 2 that is a 15 minute TOF. Two things about that. Getting a large enemy combatant within 400NM of a CVBG is going to be tough in wartime-for them. If fired from maximum range 15 minutes is a long heads up time. In wartime satellites will tell us the moment this attack begins.
46 posted on
09/20/2017 7:23:50 PM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson