Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

1. Whatever the eventual outcome is, it would have been worse under any candidate preferred by Andrew McCarthy and the NR Never Trump crowd (Jeb!, Little Marco et al.)
2. Trump has long indicated his willingness to legalize the DACA people. We don’t have to like it but this has long been his view.
3. The devil will be in the details such as
(a) what will disqualify a DACA person from participating? The Dems and RINOs will want to allow drunk drivers and domestic abusers and almost every one of them to stay.
(b) What kind of benefits will DACA people be entitled to: affirmative action in hiring or education? in-state tuition? “Earned Income Tax Credit” (welfare)? Public housing? Voting? Being counted in the census?
(c) Will they be allowed to use their status (now or upon becoming citizens) to bring their relatives to the USA?
(d) What real comes out of this on the enforcement side?
4. If it is a bad deal, Trump can and should veto it. If it is a great deal, well, opinions are going to vary but I will be in wait-and-see mode.
5. Trusting Schumer, Pelosi, The Turtle or Jug Ears would be a huge mistake.
6. If this smells like amnesty and The Wall does not get built, the President will not be reelected.


28 posted on 09/14/2017 8:35:16 AM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stingray51
1. Whatever the eventual outcome is, it would have been worse under any candidate

Don't we ever get over the notion that we should be happy because it could have been worse? We could be happy if it actually got better too couldn't we?

73 posted on 09/14/2017 10:09:19 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson