Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SomeCallMeTim

The NHC forecast tracked showed a eyewall hit on Cuba, basically the Cuban Keys. But their discussion said they thought that would not weaken Irma. They were wrong about that even though their predicted track was correct.


1,096 posted on 09/12/2017 8:47:26 AM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
But their discussion said they thought that would not weaken Irma.

It went just a few miles further south over Cuba than they predicted - and then the shear and dry air from the Gulf took a big toll on the south side of Irma just after it passed the Keys. It was a very narrow avoidance of the feared Cat 5 hit.

1,107 posted on 09/12/2017 9:20:32 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies ]

To: palmer
The NHC forecast tracked showed a eyewall hit on Cuba

That depends on which NHC forecast you look at. They were moving the track on and off Cuba, several times. On the Thurday, when they first started talking about a Cat 4/5 hitting Miami, they were showing it brushing the coast of Cuba, but NOT making landfall there... hence, little to no weakening.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/IRMA_graphics.php?product=5day_cone_with_line_and_wind

1,120 posted on 09/12/2017 10:17:26 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson