To: ifinnegan
The answer is the charge nurse on scene or should have been called.
205 posted on
09/01/2017 4:34:23 PM PDT by
morphing libertarian
(Imprison, The Clintons, Holder, Obama, and Huma for starters)
To: morphing libertarian
“The answer is the charge nurse on scene or should have been called.”
A voice of reason!
209 posted on
09/01/2017 4:35:09 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: morphing libertarian
According to the article I read, her supervisor was on the phone instructing her at the time this happened. Instead of waiting for/talking to her supervisor LE lost it.
216 posted on
09/01/2017 4:55:59 PM PDT by
Tammy8
(Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
To: morphing libertarian
The answer is the charge nurse on scene or should have been called.And what would that have changed? The officer was ignoring the hospital officials on the phone. He wanted his illegal evidence, and no mere nurse or hospital admin or charge nurse was going to stop him from getting his illegal evidence. He was demanding that she commit a crime for him (which is a felony on his part), and his fellow officers stood by and allowed it to happen (co-conspirators), so they should face charges as well.
220 posted on
09/01/2017 5:33:04 PM PDT by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: morphing libertarian
I wonder if he would have arrested a judge for refusing to give him the warrant that would have made his illegal actions legal and proper.
222 posted on
09/01/2017 5:34:00 PM PDT by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson