Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trouble in the Seventh Fleet: what may be behind Navy collisions
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | August 23, 2017 | Jason Thomson

Posted on 08/23/2017 4:29:32 PM PDT by Jagermonster

The unusual spate of collisions, two of them fatal, has called into question the US Navy’s level of preparedness, analysts say, and point to potential problems with training, maintenance, or sailors’ workload.

WASHINGTON—A recent spate of collisions involving US Navy ships from the Seventh Fleet, two of them fatal, has led the Navy to relieve that fleet’s commander, Vice Adm. Joseph Aucoin, reportedly after his superiors lost confidence in his leadership.

The latest collision, Monday off the coast of Singapore, was between the guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain and a Liberian-flagged tanker. Ten sailors were reported missing, and the Navy says divers have located the remains of some of those missing in flooded compartments of the destroyer.

The mishap follows a similar tragedy in June, in which seven sailors died when the USS Fitzgerald collided with a merchant vessel south of Japan. That followed two less serious but nonetheless unusual incidents involving ships of the Pacific-based Seventh Fleet in January and May. According to analysts, the collisions call into question the Navy’s level of military preparedness and point to potential problems with training, maintenance, and the workload endured by sailors. What is going on? It could all be down to coincidence – Monday’s collision, for example, occurred in a heavily traveled shipping lane – and any final conclusions on their cause will have to await the results of multiple investigations. Nevertheless, many analysts agree there may be some systemic problems at work here.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 7thfleet; aucoin; budget; collision; navy; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: FreedomPoster

0311 he was good for him.
I hear him, and you after reading that post. My son just last weekend was forced to watch a cross dressing video, and how to do it while in the military, you can only guess what the Marines were saying who were forced to watch it.
You son has said what I have said about women. They flirt, they use drama and while my son was at Parris Island he said the females got it much easier, and for the crucible he said most of them were not carrying packs either, but still graduated.
At MCT at Camp Geiger I saw first hand how women were flirting, and then twirking ion front of the men. I was disgusted, and I am a vet guy, but not disgusted because females did this, but because this was on base in uniform, and while they were in training it was unprofessional.

My son on firewatch said one female tried to sneak into their room to sleep with a guy who that guy told my son do not let her in as she is a skank.

You have got me going on rants so I will stop right now about all of this.


61 posted on 08/23/2017 6:49:43 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
It takes chutzpah to blame a failure of basic seamanship on the need for more taxpayer dollars. Sounds right out of the military-industrial complex lobbying playbook. Maybe we should spend more on the Navy. But before we blame these collisions on that, why not first look at the leadership aboard these two ships. Was Sanchez the right man for captain or could the Navy have chosen someone better? How was he selected and did diversity play a role?


Chances are that the University of Puerto Rico in San Juan (the skipper's school) doesn't have courses in seamanship. And I'll bet the Exec's school at the University of Bayamon doesn't either. Also makes me wonder if the two Sanchezs (Skipper and Exec) are related?

Seamanship 101!

62 posted on 08/23/2017 6:49:57 PM PDT by B-Cause (The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money - Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Go and see the kind of people joining the Navy today, most want their freebies


63 posted on 08/23/2017 6:50:24 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SpirituTuo

probably too busy cross dressing or having sex with the females, or in obama;s military males


64 posted on 08/23/2017 6:51:39 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Used to make fun of them, now one can make fun of them and know it is the truth.


65 posted on 08/23/2017 6:52:38 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
....and the Chinese are NOT responsible for hacking into US Navy navigational systems?.....sure! Just a freak series of accidents......sure!

Word from a Surface Warfare Officer today who's been in this area is that it's definitely possible it was an accident.

From the IT side of things, if the Chinese have some cool cyber weapon to hack our ships' nav systems, they're not going to waste it on some individual ship during peacetime.

66 posted on 08/23/2017 7:01:09 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
It takes chutzpah to blame a failure of basic seamanship on the need for more taxpayer dollars. Sounds right out of the military-industrial complex lobbying playbook.

Nailed it. The reason it sounds right out of the lobbyist playbook is that we have some prime choice DC swamp-critter lobbyists quoted in the article, e.g. Bryan McGrath, deputy director of the Center for American Seapower at the Hudson Institute in Washington.

Or this guy Bryan Clark, "former special assistant to the chief of naval operations, the Navy’s highest ranking military officer." - “It can all be taken back to this major root cause, which is supply not being able to keep up with demand,” adds Mr. Clark, who is now a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA).

This is prime deep-state stuff here.

Problem is fixing lack of seamanship is a matter of personnel training conducted by leadership, including a lot of time at sea, providing ship maneuvering drills. Takes time, not lots of acquisition system money or even better, inside the beltway contractor support, which is where the big slice of pie is going these days.

67 posted on 08/23/2017 7:31:35 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
cool cyber weapon to hack our ships' nav systems

Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with seamanship - ship maneuvers to avoid hitting merchants that are in plain sight. In fact, the suggestion is rather silly, actually.

68 posted on 08/23/2017 7:33:22 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jagermonster

This article is pure crap. While in the navy I went on two west-pacs, located directly in the area both cans were struck. Navy vessels are a world unto themselves. Budget woes do not affect the daily life. Port, starboard, and aft watch ensures eyes on watch 360 degrees around vessel. I remember a device called “radar” that seemed effective.

Possibly today’s navy relies entirely on automation?


69 posted on 08/23/2017 7:34:30 PM PDT by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canalabamian
Spoof the Fitzgerald's position while "guiding" the cargo vessel into it.

This is utter bullcrap. It does our sailors a disservice by distracting from the real leadership and training issues leading to poor seamanship.

70 posted on 08/23/2017 7:36:45 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jagermonster

As long as wild theories are being tossed about, was the crew on watch somehow incapacitated, perhaps an induced mental blackout? Perhaps a patterned electrical noise acting upon the nervous system?


71 posted on 08/23/2017 7:45:52 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jagermonster

The federal government has reduced the size of the Navy so they can pay antifa and other group members a living wage which allows them to stay home with their mothers and become an army when the deep state is threatened.

JoMa


72 posted on 08/23/2017 9:35:34 PM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

I couldn’the agree more with your comment. Absolute tragedy that is in the hands of the senior leaders.

An earlier comment stated that all U.S. Naval officers should be required to pass the Coast Guard 3rd mates exam. That should be a minimum requirement for any officer that serves as OOD on one of our vessels.


73 posted on 08/23/2017 9:50:51 PM PDT by B-Cause (The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money - Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: ping jockey

Things are really bad. Talking to some folks they admitted that the last time their carrier went out half the phalanx gun emplacements were not working and the primary radar was not working because a contractor who was hired for the upgrade job screwed up the install. The ship still went to sea near China. This is normal for the navy these days.


78 posted on 08/23/2017 10:24:37 PM PDT by JohnyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: ping jockey

>How about a little OPSEC there big mouth.

Happened years ago. And I if I know it, then I’m sure the Chinese do as well.


80 posted on 08/23/2017 10:42:18 PM PDT by JohnyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson