Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

I believe it was the other way around, the tanker was the one that hit the Navy ship.


23 posted on 08/23/2017 2:12:26 AM PDT by erlayman (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: erlayman

The tanker may have done so (I’m still waiting for more confirmation on that) but it looks like it was the other way around on the immediately prior collision incident with the freighter.

The thing is, there is no way in hell that either of those collisions should have happened if someone was paying attention on the bridge of the destroyer and keeping a lookout. Reportedly there were no weather conditions degrading visibility and destroyers are fast, highly maneuverable oceangoing vessels.

Both this and the prior incident are like driving around in a go-kart on a giant, perfectly flat parking lot that’s a half mile on a side, with the only other occupant of the parking lot being a large ice cream truck that’s been traveling in a straight line at 2mph. Somehow you manage to hit or be hit by the ice cream truck even though it didn’t deviate from its straightline course and didn’t accelerate.


28 posted on 08/23/2017 2:46:03 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson