1 posted on
08/16/2017 8:27:56 PM PDT by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
Yeah, it’s a “Google-driven car.”
2 posted on
08/16/2017 8:30:08 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Liberals think in propaganda)
To: Lorianne
So a cop pulls over a “driverless” car for anything, who gets the citation?
3 posted on
08/16/2017 8:34:06 PM PDT by
Fungi
(Haptoglossa mirabilis is a beautiful fungus.)
To: Lorianne
How are the potentially driverless cars doing in their testing? Awful...I recall in one early test a few years back the "driverless car" went out of control and ran into a local journalist who had come to cover the event - personally I hope we never get them - the only thing more uncomfortable than being in one while it's zipping along would be to be on the road where they're driving all around you.......
To: Lorianne
So your driving down the freeway.. Excuse me riding down the freeway and some a hole hacks the computer system controlling all the cars and all these so called computer driven cars crash..
To: Lorianne; All
8 posted on
08/16/2017 8:53:21 PM PDT by
musicman
(The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
To: Lorianne
Self-driving cars would increase the distance people are willing to commute, leading to greater emission of CO2.
Progressive dilemma there.
...
And hackers might not just crash the cars. They could kidnap people.
10 posted on
08/16/2017 8:59:00 PM PDT by
heartwood
(If you're looking for a </sarc tag>, you just saw it.)
To: Lorianne
Yet another uninformed bullshitting blogger who spreads nonsense about which he is ignorant.
12 posted on
08/16/2017 9:06:02 PM PDT by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: Lorianne
How are the potentially driverless cars doing in their testing? Awful. For example, in the first week of March, Ubers 43 test cars in three states logged some 20,000 miles on public roads. Their drivers had to intervene and take control away from the software, an average of once every mile.
An incredibly complex new technology doesn't work flawlessly right out of the gate and needs further development? Shocking, just shocking - must be doomed to failure, let's call the whole thing off.
Betting against technological advancement is a fool's bet. The bugs will be worked out and driverless cars will become a reality in a decade or two.
To: Lorianne
I'm really hoping this technology works, and I believe it eventually will. I'm getting on in years and see this as a way of allowing me to hold onto a smidgen of independence!!!
30 posted on
08/17/2017 6:37:49 AM PDT by
ontap
To: Lorianne
So’s machine manufactured, and yet...
34 posted on
08/17/2017 12:52:42 PM PDT by
discostu
(Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
To: Lorianne
Feedback occurs when outputs of a system are routed back as inputs as part of a chain of cause-and-effect that forms a circuit or loop.[2] The system can then be said to feed back into itself. The notion of cause-and-effect has to be handled carefully when applied to feedback systems.If you have one robo car in an all human driver environment then the feed back helps the robo car because intelligent beings are driving the other vehicles.
Nobody knows what will happen in an all robo car environment with CPU and software sending feed back to each other and to itself. Taking the "intelligence" out of the equation. My guess is grid lock.
49 posted on
08/18/2017 7:37:26 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson