Posted on 08/15/2017 5:14:18 AM PDT by Whenifhow
Former NSA Technical Director Bill Binney outlines how the 2016 DNC emails were actually taken by a leaker using a portable storage device, and not taken by a computer hack initiated by the vast Russian enterprise.
Mr. Binney’s outline on Tucker Carlson mirrors a previous new discussion that was reported within The Nation –See Here– A generally far-left media outlet.
The reality that it was an internal leak further advances the possibility that DNC employee Seth Rich was actually the person who took the DNC email data after becoming disenfranchised by the DNC intentionally undermining Bernie Sanders and aiding candidate Hillary Clinton. Seth Rich was murdered under rather unusual circumstances in 2016, shortly after WikiLeaks began releasing and publishing the emails.
Trace routes aren’t always reliable, I can use proxy chaining and then hack into some schmuck’s computer in Bolivia and make it look like it came from there.
But with that said, China hacks us all the time so Binney’s statement can still hold water. If any of this does go to trial and the defense lawyers have IQ’s higher than room temperature, the discovery phase should be extremely interesting. However, I don’t think that’s Mueller’s angle, I think he will try and get Manafort on financial crimes and then try to get him to squeal in return for leniency.
Mueller is trying to pull a rope-a-dope.
Binney was part of this group VIPS that analyzed the meta data.
Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computer. After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device.
Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here].
...the reason why DNC and DWS wouldn’t allow inspection of their servers and laptops. They knew no Russian hacking could be found... and now they need to be investigated for Collusion and False allegations...
What's really funny is the MSM has tied their credibility to this obviously false story.
Isn't Clapper a liberal elite jerk?
Big Question: Did Debbie Wasserman Schultz have the Awans involved in the DNC servers in any way?
DWS employed the Awans, particularly Imran Awan, for all her Congressional Democrat IT.
They had her confidence (or somehow had her in their power).
They had her iPad and passwords.
DWS, as head of the DNC, would have IT needs, and she already had IT people she worked with. Is it not likely she would use them for DNC work at some level?
Scrutinizing the Awans is crucial to the DNC data theft case, on which the Russian hacking narrative rides. If Seth Rich was the guilty party, “the Awans” will be the defense unless they have been eliminated as suspects.
Heh....good point.
This guy is a treasure trove of great information. He is a terrible TV guest.
Watch the interview. The details are all there.
Clapper was not the head of the NSA at that time. He was: Director of National Intelligence (2010–2017), under the traitor Obama like Brennan was.
Admiral Mike Rogers was the good intel guy.
Admiral Rogers met with Trump after the November election to tell Trump that he had been surveilled/monitored and possibly about this new reality.
Admiral Roders is the good guy. Rogers was the guy, whom, Clapper and Brennan wanted fired for going to Trump to discuss what Brennan and Clapper had done to Trump, Trump’s family and Trump’s people.
Was Guccifer 2.0 a separate dump from Wikileaks?
This metadata is from Guccifer 2.0?
Guccifer 2.0 tried to make it look like a Russian hacker?
Would Seth Rich try to make it look like the Russians?
Was Guccifer 2.0 a separate dump from Wikileaks?
This metadata is from Guccifer 2.0?
Guccifer 2.0 tried to make it look like a Russian hacker?
Would Seth Rich try to make it look like the Russians?
****
Others may have more details on the questions you asked.
I did find this link with analysis.
Guccifer 2.0 NGP/VAN Metadata Analysis
https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
Thanks for the link to get here... Interesting that no one had taken on Bill Binney ... they ignore him, don’t cover him, but NO ONE had taken him on or stood up to him or called him a liar.
That’s telling.
I saw an interview with Binney - he comes across as an honest man who’s made the decision he’s OK with ‘standing alone’ if that’s what it takes.
Impressive dude.
*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.