Replies

For the last time. I am as entitled to comment on what I see as anyone else is. If you HAVE INVOLVED PEOPLE WHO HAVE CONFIRMED WHAT THESE ITEMS ARE then you need to include this information with your presentation on this forum, not just tell us we have to buy the book to find out.

To have all that evidence and STILL choose to argue about what I did or didn’t think I saw way back when...

What evidence? A lot of cobbled together images one isn't allowed to dispute? A load of contentions supposedly from a team of experts we do not know who they are, or what their conclusions are? Sorry, but I am missing something. I think it's simply called proof. But then of course all I need to do is buy the book!

I just re-read through the FR thread with the tile I Made a Mistake remember that?

I MADE A MISTAKE LINK

The entire kerfuffle about the body in the coffin not being Fuddy because the coffin was the wrong size...etc. And all those people filing past in mourning, all being in on it. So you just made a simple little mistake about measurements, did you? It really was Fuddy in the coffin after all?

Sorry, you really can't abrogate your past contentions and take a new direction. You might remember what happened to the girl who cried wolf once too often. Once Fuddy's coffin wasn't too big or too small, it was just the right size for a blow-up dummy, was it? And the mourners filing past the coffin didn't know?

ok, now who's nuts? And why oh why are you basing all your bona-fides on what a very small number of freepers might be thinking? It's such a small audience for a world shattering conspiracy that numbers many thousands in its cast. There's the emergency services, the medical crew, the funeral director, the employees of the HDOH, Fuddy's friends and relatives, the Navy...just to name a few.

Like I keep saying, you need a Sponsor. Someone who sees things through the same lens you and your associate does. Maybe you should try Joel Gilbert. He's very good at this sort of thing. I mean, Joel found a piece of wood that had been lying in a shed for 50 years and was able to match that up to some photographs of an exotic model who posed for images in 1958 and presented them as being of Stanley Ann Dunham, who was still in high school when those photographs were first published. Joel would probably love your scenario for a film. Then you could give FR a break.

No personal insult intended. I just think you are heading into a dead end.