Media outlets like the NYT, Washington Post and CNN have spent months demonstrating to the world that they really are fake news ...
... but then the moment one of them posts a story about "leaks" about the investigation, so many people here on FR accept it as the gospel truth? LOL.
Please cite me one "leak" that amounts to a verifiable piece of evidence about Mueller's investigation ... and by this I mean an article from any media source that either: (1) names a source, or (2) names a person who is allegedly a target of the investigation and then posts a quote from that person confirming that he/she has been questioned, received a grand jury subpoena, etc.
Good luck with that. You're chasing smoke and mirrors, dude. Ten bucks says the "leaks" are nothing more than fabricated stories put out there by Democrat operatives for the sole purpose of baiting President Trump into doing something stupid like firing Mueller.
I would submit that anything RosenKrantz tells the media without express permission from his chain of command about his colluder Mueller’s operation is a “leak”.
Largely for propaganda purposes.
The guy is a classic DC Hack.
If the DoJ has nothing, they should shutup or kill the “investigation”.
I’ve been saying the same thing for weeks.
The Washington Post and The New York Times are fake news outlets to conservatives, UNTIL they publish some particularly, anti-Trump “bombshell,” and suddenly, conservatives are terrified by the story.