I would call those interesting observations that have no effect on factual evidence one way or the other, wouldn’t you?
not all of the conspiracy theories are based on distortions. you comment is factually inaccurate. there’s plenty of cats to show that LBJ and the mafia independently had strong reasons to kill the president.
Also, I believe in the old adage. Who benefited the most. the answer is clearly Johnson. on the motive factor my money is on one of these two or both. it wouldn’t have been the first tme the government asked Roselli to kill a president.
Tp call this information distortions is just wrong and neglects the point that there are distortions in the commission;s report, dissent, and you can see three or four other reasoned arguments to not believe it right here on this thread.