Posted on 07/28/2017 10:19:56 AM PDT by davikkm
A new study has found Muslims born in Denmark feel more fury at Western foreign intervention, and are more inclined to help Muslims by violent means, than foreign-born people who migrated from conflict zones. An international team of researchers, led by Milan Obaidi of Sweden’s Uppsala University, conducted two surveys in order to identify signs of victimisation-by-proxy — whereby, in its most extreme form, Muslims born in Europe who have never lived outside the continent become so angry at the treatment of Muslims abroad that they consider carrying out acts of violence.
In order to compare the attitudes of Muslims born in Denmark with foreign-born migrants who had lived in a conflict zone during a Western military operation, researchers surveyed the two groups — looking at measures of Muslim identification, group-based anger and perceptions of Western military intervention in Muslim-majority countries.
Also examined were the cohorts’ tendencies to violence, and their nonviolent intentions to defend or support Islam and other Muslims.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Why are they even there in the first place? Once you lure in a welfare parasite they become harder to get rid of.
Muslims may very well be “Unsafe At Any Speed”.
Stands to reason.
The immigrants are usually happy to be there, because they know the hell-holes from whence they came from.
The offspring, on the other-hand who are born there, don’t appreciate that, and just feel like they are outsiders.
It’s what I’ve been saying all along. The problem with Muslim immigrants, isn’t as much with the immigrants themselves, it’s with their offspring. It’s a ticking time-bomb.
And Americans back in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries treated immigrants like crap, and they assimilated just fine.
The immigrants are usually happy to be there......Don’t believe that. Teir mosques have sent them there to invade and get jizyah (to be sent home to further the cycle). Prove it? Read the Koran.
Of course. This is perfectly understandable. Their warped culture makes them failures in adapting to the West. Because they’ve been taught the lie that Islam makes them superior,and they can see that they are failures, they ignorantly decide it’s the fault of the West. It is crazy to bring them into modern society where their violence is to be expected.
They should be skinned alive on tv, with frequent breaks to rub bacon fat into their wounds. Bet that’d cool their heels and help them score much lower on “violence predictors.”
Perhaps with the recent wave of immigrants that is true. But in general, the Muslims that have been the most radical have been the ones born in the host country.
The same is true in the UK, and everywhere else I’ll bet. I have posted this before, a 2007 study out of the UK. It was bad back then, and I’m sure it’s worse now.
Young, British Muslims ‘getting more radical’ :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1540895/Young-British-Muslims-getting-more-radical.html
Richard Csaplar wrote the following:
The Muslim wars of imperialist conquest have been launched for almost 1,500 years against hundreds of nations, over millions of square miles (significantly larger than the British Empire at its peak). The lust for Muslim imperialist conquest stretched from southern France to the Philippines, from Austria to Nigeria, and from central Asia to New Guinea. This is the classic definition of imperialism — “the policy and practice of seeking to dominate the economic and political affairs of weaker countries.”
Mohammed died in 632 BC and Csaplar credits him with starting the crusades.
So, what’s going on in Denmark is merely a continuation of what Mohammed started and the Danes only have two choices. They can bow to the muzzies including Sharia Law (burka’s stoning women, rape) or they can fight them. The sucking up, backing up days are over. It’s TIME TO CHOOSE UP SIDES!
Similar to the difference in attitude between many American born blacks and non-muslim black African immigrants.
I have friends from Nigeria, they cannot stand American blacks.
muslim immigration:
The kids will be worse than the parents.
Everywhere, every time.
It is not bred in the bone - it is the way that they are educated.
The mosques in the West are new (more than half of those in the US were built since 9-11), and about 90% were funded by Wahabbis, like Saudi Arabia.
Those mosques have textbooks written by Wahabbis, and Imams trained by Wahabbis (who are often covertly terrorist recruiters). In Army terms, those mosques are the Recruiting Command, and Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) for militant islam.
A lot of immigrants innocently send their kids to the only mosque nearby, assuming that they will be like the neighborhood mosques that they grew up with. In most cases, those kids will be subjected to an artfully designed program of radicalization, unbeknownst to (or in conjunction with) the parents.
That is the heart of the problem - allowing radicals to train those kids.
Is this the choice, be fertilized or be shot ?
No, shoot the `fertilizers’ when caught in the act. Simple.
From the article:
“Recent studies demonstrate that due to perceived discrimination, Muslims separate more from host societies compared to comparable minorities belonging to other religions and this effect appears to be greater among second- and third-generation Muslims,” the paper noted.
I’d be willing to bet that those studies do NOT in fact show that “perceived discrimination” CAUSES muslims to self segregate more than other minorities. I believe that is just the conventional wisdom assumption of leftist academics showing. Muslim minorities in the West are actively incited by well organized and well funded campaigns that are designed to achieve that outcome.
The Muslim Brotherhood has a deliberate program to “community organize” muslim immigrants in Western countries, with huge funding from Gulf Arab countries. Huma Abedin’s family business was helping to design and implement this for the Saudis, for decades. That is what the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, which her and her family have long been involved in editing, is essentially all about.
One of the first points that they strive to instill, is that Western values are corrupt and sinful, and that you should not have any non-muslims as friends. Then they continue to expose them to agitprop about how muslims are being unfairly victimized and oppressed. No wonder they develop those attitudes - unless of course, you are a leftist academic - then it must be the the fault of discrimination by racist Westerners.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.