Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Interview, Trump Expresses Anger at Sessions and Comey, and Warns Mueller
NY Slimes ^ | 7/19/2017 | Peter Baker

Posted on 07/19/2017 4:37:40 PM PDT by usafa92

WASHINGTON — President Trump said on Wednesday that he never would have appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions had he known Mr. Sessions would recuse himself from overseeing the Russia investigation that has dogged his presidency, calling the decision “very unfair to the president.”

In a remarkable public break with one of his earliest political supporters, Mr. Trump complained that Mr. Sessions’s decision ultimately led to the appointment of a special counsel that should not have happened. “Sessions should have never recused himself and if he was going to recuse himself he should have told me before he took the job and I would have picked somebody else,” Mr. Trump said.

In a wide-ranging interview with The New York Times, the president also accused James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director he fired in May, of trying to leverage a dossier of compromising material to keep his job. Mr. Trump criticized both the acting F.B.I. director who has been filling in since Mr. Comey’s dismissal and the deputy attorney general who recommended it. And he took on Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel now leading the investigation into Russian meddling in last year’s election.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agsessions; comey; mueller; second100days; sessions; trump; trumpdoj; trumpmueller; trumprussia; trumpsessions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last
To: semantic

True
But Trump needs allies and I don’t see any
It is almost like he is completely on his own


161 posted on 07/19/2017 7:34:10 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Yes, but are the miseries if and risks to his family, including Don Jr and Kushner, enough to lead Trump to act anyway? What is the point of this public calling out if not a rationale for action?


162 posted on 07/19/2017 7:47:21 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Again, you have to invoke cheese in the maze. Maybe he is upset. I know he was upset the day Sessions announced his recusal.

On the other hand, this is exactly what I’ve come to expect from Trump just as a major offensive is about to begin-—as likely as not, with Sessions leading.


163 posted on 07/19/2017 7:52:26 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Don’t be so sure. That is precisely Trump’s MO. Remember Trump to “Bannon and Kushner, ‘You guys WORK IT OUT?’”

There was nothing to work out. It was all theater. What did Ike do with Patton just before putting him in charge of the 3d Army? Supposedly had him in the doghouse, when in fact he had Patton tagged to lead the offensive across Europe all the time.

Moreover, I don’t know how you can say that a guy who has crushed illegal gangs, helped in the deportation of hundreds, gotten thousands to self deport, and set up an assault on sanctuary cities is a disappointment at all, let alone a “colossal disappointment.”

Personally, I’d expect a major offensive now from Sessions, likely in the criminal side toward Lynch et al.


164 posted on 07/19/2017 7:55:47 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

It’s clear that if Trump fails to stop the ruling elite’s servants, the Clintons and the D.C. Establishment from ruining his presidency, they will bury Trump with continued attacks and we the people lose. Trump’s “Let’s just move on” policy against the Clintons further kills the rule of law in DC


165 posted on 07/19/2017 7:58:32 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Well, I’m totally opposite of everyone on this thread. I not only think this is a smokescreen by Trump-—entirely consistent with every other major move he has made-—but in fact it’s all the more likely Sessions will be heading the next offensive.

See if I’m right on this.


166 posted on 07/19/2017 7:59:14 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Blackmail is what makes DC go round. I think there is a chance that Sessions was compromised from the start. Tthe racism, etc., charges have stopped since he was confirmed It is actually strange how little Trump’s AG has been a target, really.


167 posted on 07/19/2017 8:33:03 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: LS

So far, you’ve been right!
Go, DJT!
Mesmerize the opposition and pull rabbits out of your socks!


168 posted on 07/19/2017 8:39:40 PM PDT by bitt (The press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

...and visa versa...

:)


169 posted on 07/19/2017 8:50:41 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: LS

I think your analysis is correct.

The statement about Sessions by Trump make no sense, out of the blue, unnatural... and from what I gather about Trump, is that he does nothing off the cuff, for no reason, etc. It’s planned and figured out in advance. So there is a reason for his statement. It just jumps out of the background like a red book in a black and white photograph.


170 posted on 07/19/2017 9:00:00 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Yes. Miller worked for Sessions.


171 posted on 07/19/2017 9:40:39 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: TexasCruzin

2024. Sorry.


172 posted on 07/19/2017 9:42:01 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Mathis is tied up with infighting with McMaster wanting another Grand War in the Middle East. Plus, he still does not have half his people in place yet.


173 posted on 07/19/2017 9:43:42 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LS

Totally agree with you, Hide and watch


174 posted on 07/19/2017 10:38:14 PM PDT by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: LS

I’m with you.

Pass the popcorn!


175 posted on 07/19/2017 10:40:42 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
It’s a dumb comment by Trump.

More of a "enough already" shot across the bow that needed to be taken. Same as how he is now actively twisting nipples in the Congress - he was as patient as could be and now it's time to make sure they and all their constituents who voted for them because of promises to do the right thing, and voted for Trump for his agenda, know where the problem lies.

176 posted on 07/20/2017 2:58:16 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

You may have missed the sarcasm of my ‘deeply humbled’ Pence style comment :<)


177 posted on 07/20/2017 4:44:34 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

“It is important for the DOJ to maintain independence from a president

That is one of the dumbest things I have read today. Neither the Justice Department or the FBI are independent, they work for the President period. “

No, just like the President, they work for the American people, with the purpose and responsibility to uphold the Constitution and laws of the United States. Sessions did not swear an oath to defend Donald Trump, but rather to “defend the Constitution of the United States”.


178 posted on 07/20/2017 7:44:38 AM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I probably did. Somebody must have said “deeply humbled”. Enlighten me.


179 posted on 07/20/2017 7:54:10 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: mtrott
No, just like the President, they work for the American people, with the purpose and responsibility to uphold the Constitution and laws of the United States.

He still has a boss, that being the President.

180 posted on 07/20/2017 10:25:15 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson