It doesn't even prove that. It might prove that if he had continued meeting after he discovered there was nothing here. That seems to have happened early.
It only proves that paid pundits have to say something to justify their existence.
Anyone remotely connected to any such campaign would accept the invitation to meet. Those pundits commenting on Junior's mental state would be the first to meet. For all we know, they may have been but discovered even earlier in the process there was nothing to obtain.
Jake Tapper said something about Junior committing collusion. Was that 1st degree collusion? Premeditated collusion? Collusion after the fact? Attempted collusion? Conspiring to commit collusion?
CNN, NYT and MSNBC were jokes long before this. This could be the ultimate joke, but there is no energy left for laughing.
It doesn't even prove that. It might prove that if he had continued meeting after he discovered there was nothing here. That seems to have happened early.
That is what I was attempting to explain to Tennessee man, but he clearly did not get it.
Fact is, there is no way potential damaging information on political opponents would be simply ignored by any party in such an election. That's not reality. Fact is he listened, then totally ignored it.
Comments such as, "Don Jr. is not very smart", in regards to this, are absurd and sounds like something a media stooge would pop off with.
But the person from Tennessee won't respond as they're still running from and evading the last question.☺