[dragnet2]

No, it did not turn out good information on his opponent. That's been established. Try to keep up.

Back to my question. As the Trump campaign was being hit with relentless 24/7 political attacks from every direction during the election, attacks not only from D.C. but the media as well, would you simply ignore any possible credible sources who allegedly had dirt on your opponent?

I'll answer it for ya.

No you wouldn't and neither would anyone else during such a relentless campaign of corruption that your opponents were operating.

[tennmountainman]

I don’t think Don did anything illegal. I have never said that in any of my posts. I think the whole thing is a nothing burger.

However, there were a lot of red flags in the fruit cake from England’s
original e mail to Don.
I do believe poor judgement was used to even listen to this fruit cake.
As it turns out, he was not a credible source. That is all I am saying.