I don’t think Don did anything illegal. I have never said that in any of my posts. I think the whole thing is a nothing burger.
However, there were a lot of red flags in the fruit cake from England’s
original e mail to Don.
I do believe poor judgement was used to even listen to this fruit cake.
As it turns out, he was not a credible source. That is all I am saying.
This begs the question, like investigators, cops, DA's, FBI, political consultants, CIA, etc, all use different sources, some not so credible and some flat out dubious. Are you suggesting in the future, those who rely on sources such as these for possible information should simply ignore them?
How in tarnation do ya know if someone has valid information unless you speak with them?
This begs the question, like investigators, cops, DA's, FBI, political consultants, CIA, etc, all use different sources, some not so credible and some flat out dubious. Are you suggesting in the future, those who rely on sources such as these for possible information should simply ignore them?
That's not all you're saying. You're also saying you don't want to answer difficult or uncomfortable questions which may not fit into your narrative.