No. The food that is available, and how available it is creates the attitude. Areas of food hardship build cultures that put much more stock in the meaning of sharing, areas of plenty build cultures that put much more stock on variety of experience.
Remember, if Hillary isn’t the most unlikable person to ever run for president, and she actually bothers to fight for the Rustbelt, she’s president right now. “The monolith” gave her the win, luckily the Founding Fathers were much smarter than you, understood that America was a collection of micro-cultures, and structured an electoral method that demanded the candidates win as many micro-cultures as possible and Hillary failed.
Culture is how people think, feel or act in response to circumstances. This is derived from basic beliefs about self and others, as derived from answers to questions such as “who am I,” “who is God,” and “what is the meaning of life” and is entirely independent of food style.
No, the monolith you’re talking about, the 65,844,000 Hillary votes, was likely at least three to five million votes from the culture of Mexico.
Meanwhile, Trump got the 62,979,000 winning monolith vote of American culture.