If the guy wanted to discuss this as a piece of science,and not politics, he would avoid polemical phrases like “trickle-down ignorance”.
But I see he wants to discuss Climate Change as a feature of political ideology.
When “trickle down” is invoked, you know the argument is BS. That is a favorite Alinskyite phrase.
>>But I see he wants to discuss Climate Change as a feature of political ideology.
Of course he does. He has built his professional career around this particular gravy train, unfortunately. The current status of things is a threat to his livelihood. He probably has a mortgage, kids who need braces and a college education, etc. Always follow the money.
Our Left for decades quoted Eisenhower’s farewell speech in warning against the military-industrial complex. And they were probably correct in doing so, but they probably went overboard in many cases.
In that same speech, Eisenhower also warned against Big Science. We see with Climate Alarmism he was correct there, too.
The entire article is subjective, not objective.
This communication style is one of the problems of the left. They think they are being the smartest people on the planet by whining about how they are not believed when they never really argue the science. They only argue their moral superiority and the blessing of their fellow priests on their worship of the idols and demons they have created.