To: LUV W
I'd question the criteria of any survey which ranks Baltimore only #14. What are they smoking to rank Philadelphia (#42) ahead of Salt Lake City (#32)? And Los Angeles and Oakland aren't even on the list!
Lubbock may get bad marks only because it is relatively isolated and tornado prone, but it baffles me why they would make the list otherwise. There isn't anything wrong with isolation if you have everything you need.
8 posted on
07/03/2017 4:57:24 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: Vigilanteman
On this list, being “14” is worse than being “42” or “32.”
Number one was Detroit.
26 posted on
07/03/2017 5:20:01 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Vigilanteman; LUV W
Details at the report site: Lubbock because 22% poverty and twice the violent crime of Texas or US.
43 posted on
07/03/2017 5:49:23 PM PDT by
gnarledmaw
(Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
To: Vigilanteman
They are not using the same criteria I would.
To: Vigilanteman
Lubbock, the little I know from being there just once, seemed clean, peaceful, sunny, if windy...
82 posted on
07/03/2017 7:53:14 PM PDT by
cherry
To: Vigilanteman; LUV W
Re: Lubbock, TX
I'll guess ethnicity may play a role.
In 2010, Lubbock was 45% non-white, including almost 9% Black.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson